Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753872AbWKRWSQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:18:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753888AbWKRWSQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:18:16 -0500 Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.207]:50053 "HELO smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753872AbWKRWSP (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 17:18:15 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=d6xOSKX2Q60sjfHoJMz0zAV/4aWaXJfcPEre14YrJ50JpFbSx0ajCL3bniMHu0S+7oS9B/1x8pIBpnD+HAnfE6lpmvB88CCytGlcp9u0wxheQcwjbZjZXvXgLwetJv7hiEjfyzFyoc4Vcagkc/U45OUVML5zcDAKOg8S8Gt+2QA= ; X-YMail-OSG: Ewql5coVM1nPCnMvyMC.NORIEVpYZchglqz3xiiDmi4UBvpZEdU7hpyVOM3D6VaUAxXxdiob3A4dJtLoHbOrts4ACEevPL.g72lpYVEVHvjDwp1A8TR7wAUNCyfpPQzl6.XH_g0jZN4du225aQ1v_4b9mwZBs2k2LxA- From: David Brownell To: Pierre Ossman Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] [RFC] Add MMC Password Protection (lock/unlock) support V6 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:18:09 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Anderson Briglia , "Linux-omap-open-source@linux.omap.com" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Tony Lindgren , "Aguiar Carlos (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" , "Biris Ilias (EXT-INdT/Manaus)" References: <455DB1FB.1060403@indt.org.br> <200611181117.54242.david-b@pacbell.net> <455F7E2A.60009@drzeus.cx> In-Reply-To: <455F7E2A.60009@drzeus.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611181418.10675.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 21 On Saturday 18 November 2006 1:42 pm, Pierre Ossman wrote: > David Brownell wrote: > > I thought the MMC vendors expected to see the actual user-typed > > password get SHA1-hashed into a value which would take up the whole > > buffer? In general that's a good idea, since it promotes use of > > longer passphrases (more information) over short ones (easy2crack). > > > > This sounds like policy though, so it is something user space should > concern itself with. We should just provide the infrastructure. The kernel shouldn't hash, right. But the userspace toos probably should be doing that ... they're the other part of the infrastructure. :) - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/