Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp612195pxv; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykpbaNYm7mF7t0IR94zGeiBhYEdyN3SNS3rRuwa8qZFAxScvsnIV4yKAVRcGRYIrBrvKJO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:c58:: with SMTP id g24mr5159546jal.63.1626373828988; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:30:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626373828; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EEXeowJWUIbPBr6ein7+5qCVPApcftdZuOO7ql7pyApUfWgMAIiVrJ9K3GP6LhFTwm 9Lz5Xf/RZr9lgRwxJHuYssN+nvS0WuDW1iAFsGT7sCJOa0A5WmWJ56x25WS6rUQ7F9Nv kpU6Oh81tvbVcXg6DYH4scbw5Q+e91igj+lTyx1QEGIkLFe8TLnwlmLXveD0tzYjG/LQ CbXFThuP3OQHrt9rFgQvjdP84AZZbvIXwnRF3OELrA2dJn1ZGLosAYK7kj4DAOkgFxzD J+uYxN17PsiS5/FL0F4XoeVNJQm6iBh+6dNPeLl4mw5mjd4520I0UupE69dA9HhiRpYo jaGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=Ww5AWcoKsbcCMvlAL16IO8d1awsCCUxNrPPkOWqNm6o=; b=KTsDHtrBukXlDiveafomQkLJoj10w5pHzSZ1YreXAeCLnuGHw5uDQcWDJAGQEsTcdm raWurYH61F4BWuyKakpn5rDUvTUYUOUnHEfgGRVZohvUzvccnT2WLO/AOmphoieL+mXw iPq1VwwLDcLy3n2VuCP78H71tUo8WtcVY5G5fEYvSY0Dw6hsCrxAo0znLFjh3NSWdzou ZBsgT24feH4drRXS9BfJtc+DUhP4vsECIuL5O3GMQ/HZQa7RZ88AGiAfxfVNF573BDQJ br6v0KhmarrKlPybu0CrVuSmx43DozSNQxCcG77+W+iMG4A9Dyg4a6R0dIULjiY8lEZk 6yHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u5si8314120jad.124.2021.07.15.11.30.16; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237394AbhGOSN2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:13:28 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:59026 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237256AbhGOSN1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:13:27 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:32868) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m45oe-0027Qn-3X; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:10:32 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:56964 helo=email.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m45od-00CSsZ-3J; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:10:31 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Marco Elver Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Florian Weimer , "David S. Miller" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Collingbourne , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , sparclinux , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , kasan-dev References: Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:09:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:49:45 -0500") Message-ID: <87a6mnzbx2.fsf_-_@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1m45od-00CSsZ-3J;;;mid=<87a6mnzbx2.fsf_-_@disp2133>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19QOntclRPIA/u9ynQgdmZ9S2p6E+o6EFA= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_05, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.5 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 1 to 5% * [score: 0.0415] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Marco Elver X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 428 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.6 (0.9%), b_tie_ro: 2.5 (0.6%), parse: 0.71 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 2.6 (0.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.07 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.6 (0.6%), tests_pri_-950: 1.03 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 0.83 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 88 (20.6%), check_bayes: 87 (20.2%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.6%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.7%), b_comp_prob: 1.62 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 68 (15.9%), b_finish: 0.82 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 312 (72.9%), check_dkim_signature: 0.40 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.6 (1.1%), poll_dns_idle: 1.21 (0.3%), tests_pri_10: 2.9 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 8 (1.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Final si_trapno bits X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org As a part of a fix for the ABI of the newly added SIGTRAP TRAP_PERF a si_trapno was reduced to an ordinary extention of the _sigfault case of struct siginfo. When Linus saw the complete set of changes come in as a fix he requested that the set of changes be trimmed down to just what was necessary to fix the SIGTRAP TRAP_PERF ABI. I had intended to get the rest of the changes into the merge window for v5.14 but I dropped the ball. I have made the changes to stop using __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO be per architecture so they are easier to review. In doing so I found one place on alpha where I used send_sig_fault instead of send_sig_fault_trapno(... si_trapno = 0). That would not have changed the userspace behavior but it did make the kernel code less clear. My rule in these patches is everywhere that siginfo layout calls for SIL_FAULT_TRAPNO the code uses either force_sig_fault_trapno or send_sig_fault_trapno. And of course I have rebased and compile tested Marco's compile time assert patches. Eric Eric W. Biederman (3): signal/sparc: si_trapno is only used with SIGILL ILL_ILLTRP signal/alpha: si_trapno is only used with SIGFPE and SIGTRAP TRAP_UNK signal: Remove the generic __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO support Marco Elver (3): sparc64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets arm: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 -- arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c | 2 +- arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c | 4 +-- arch/alpha/kernel/traps.c | 26 +++++++++--------- arch/alpha/mm/fault.c | 4 +-- arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 -- arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 3 -- arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c | 2 +- arch/sparc/kernel/signal32.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/sparc/kernel/signal_64.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c | 2 +- arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c | 2 +- arch/sparc/kernel/traps_32.c | 22 +++++++-------- arch/sparc/kernel/traps_64.c | 44 +++++++++++++---------------- arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_32.c | 2 +- arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c | 2 +- arch/sparc/mm/fault_64.c | 2 +- include/linux/sched/signal.h | 11 ++------ kernel/signal.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 22 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)