Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756807AbWKSRg0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:36:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756805AbWKSRg0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:36:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:49575 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756807AbWKSRgZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:36:25 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:33:37 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [patch] PM: suspend/resume debugging should depend on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND In-Reply-To: <200611190320_MC3-1-D21B-111C@compuserve.com> Message-ID: References: <200611190320_MC3-1-D21B-111C@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 24 On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > When doing 'make oldconfig' we should ask about suspend/resume > debug features when SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not enabled. That's wrong. I never use SOFTWARE_SUSPEND, and I think the whole concept is totally broken. Sane people use suspend-to-ram, and that's when you need the suspend and resume debugging. Software-suspend is silly. I want my machine back in three seconds, not waiting for minutes.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/