Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
Date:   Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:42:52 +0200
Message-Id: <162638886252.651069.16002951650407635275.b4-ty@sntech.de>
In-Reply-To: <20210208143855.418374-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
References: <20210208143855.418374-1-geert+renesas@glider.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:38:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
> To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
> ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
      commit: 2a1c55d4762dd34a8b0f2e36fb01b7b16b60735b

I actually found the old one deep down in my inbox some days ago,
so had applied that one already. Hope nothing changed with your
RESEND.


Best regards,
-- 
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>