Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 16 Jul 2021 08:31:27 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@eideticom.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/16] dma-iommu: Return error code from
 iommu_dma_map_sg()
Message-ID: <20210716063127.GB13345@lst.de>
References: <20210715164544.6827-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20210715164544.6827-5-logang@deltatee.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210715164544.6827-5-logang@deltatee.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

Careful here. What do all these errors from the low-level code mean
here?  I think we need to clearly standardize on what we actually
return from ->map_sg and possibly document what the callers expect and
can do, and enforce that only those error are reported.