Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210208143855.418374-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <162638886252.651069.16002951650407635275.b4-ty@sntech.de>
In-Reply-To: <162638886252.651069.16002951650407635275.b4-ty@sntech.de>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:15:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUYLVHwb1EdLO0D-cAyJAvx=pjHHZNg1wDCmVu+nTBVKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Heiko,

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:42 AM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:38:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
> > To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
> > ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
>       commit: 2a1c55d4762dd34a8b0f2e36fb01b7b16b60735b
>
> I actually found the old one deep down in my inbox some days ago,
> so had applied that one already. Hope nothing changed with your
> RESEND.

They're identical, thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds