Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1136919pxv; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:26:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzGcj5d5WGo3PZ8YfwSmrH+tRGOBUwSaBo16RGqZfWjqg+C88AGsvfHWgvfNdaLFFiAsMM X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:51d4:: with SMTP id v20mr10625256ejk.107.1626427573270; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:26:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626427573; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N3rgB+CfA+sDmHw+kDQr1MikI9RvrM21KCgVh6EIdp2VemSor+jvSx4+FKvfimVrOm 9ZW4OkEZ5NTQ2X5Gu4sIA2GvbpMp8iNzINlVoxSFjMx7+j9O6lZGl1kEMKRqh2eYhFLh lXYiEcEBbp+3gpffWRUJw11NQFHyCro6N1Qt5HCWMAPt2ajmeSUBWMzrdIW/UNXQuWTy 5D8MQN5QLyAgQcn3nPUvVDm9592p/GuoHOe7//xvc9NvEnWit5J+Ws5pLtGwTKh3b9j4 /AgtqCuNLg+QMGdj3K71QCEmviVHb8Y1qRa3Ll8/tBg7QsCHM+rHFHHmyt2/uf/HJTvb 5G7Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=fl/EXT2tNjsgdTiy3OICqnEHZekrSV4EfOt/zoVrF98=; b=KO2bPUwUG+LMSl7LkNzXw57ATVwIT0bh3s/wQP6Li+A6EheqluuEZh6surl8s7RJeD 8qympkQyT13Y4HEM9dib2HD7B1AhZ/cWxj4itOX4BoN0wxQTZyjXUFMBIffe4h9gKAZB 1f2gWPy04uGHGp9LwuEnqtSO/Cxu7l2fQ+HWANV+U7UDJmEkAw7nuB53oU2kDqUFHing EoDp0IqNgmt+D9erl96xwM73CawV/sOJqV912s/9rCVu1ch+s5WDPz8cYdyr9oYHGo6V 8oZO8qtfEcx83Xj3QtdTNqABadRkVayBijjMo/xCAtIfTJe3im32hCekeTiKdnLVRko2 89ow== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tq-group.com header.s=key1 header.b=YNrsxQNK; dkim=pass header.i=@tq-group.com header.s=key1 header.b=JsSC5jPR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=tq-group.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h9si10007522eje.11.2021.07.16.02.25.50; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@tq-group.com header.s=key1 header.b=YNrsxQNK; dkim=pass header.i=@tq-group.com header.s=key1 header.b=JsSC5jPR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=tq-group.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233364AbhGPJ0w (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:26:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.tq-group.com ([93.104.207.81]:64833 "EHLO mx1.tq-group.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231354AbhGPJ0v (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:26:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tq-group.com; i=@tq-group.com; q=dns/txt; s=key1; t=1626427437; x=1657963437; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fl/EXT2tNjsgdTiy3OICqnEHZekrSV4EfOt/zoVrF98=; b=YNrsxQNKVfpejlOmOj8gs6yjMXBDvL4oUg47kOrJpPS03y12pulMPV9l RmmYEhaUFC0vvKKLu+0zMbT28zoZcWv8jflnHp840wPPGnncTVoU/QG3N q2gUhc9j/hGXPgDmktmvKWY4UhpshBzJzyuTFD3ccIxjYFoty8CwJb6fJ WL3ntSzZO3B7TFFsgyChewqyGl9wf7mHBsjJZwZ8N+AwLBwy44850hxGi RIrZJdYpKSEvDOuBRw/mEOxKNyqnvqXUe5ahMbGAFL3TpYwOTATJXu1rc Nh0ADHAnPh6JaqRBDCtPyCTUJwv8umpKGl6OHlgp+xi8uzzfCErT7aajL w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,244,1620684000"; d="scan'208";a="18490951" Received: from unknown (HELO tq-pgp-pr1.tq-net.de) ([192.168.6.15]) by mx1-pgp.tq-group.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2021 11:23:55 +0200 Received: from mx1.tq-group.com ([192.168.6.7]) by tq-pgp-pr1.tq-net.de (PGP Universal service); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:23:55 +0200 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by tq-pgp-pr1.tq-net.de on Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:23:55 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tq-group.com; i=@tq-group.com; q=dns/txt; s=key1; t=1626427435; x=1657963435; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fl/EXT2tNjsgdTiy3OICqnEHZekrSV4EfOt/zoVrF98=; b=JsSC5jPRA0Y9yV5q9jxyt0l9hXRjXEIhEyPnj2ax00Pu/yHOMOZbhfvF NizivZai7M6wTyQfc7Qu1RKptVAJi2ZW6C0vm8vNaVhHtgSmTuct41YWE i2dC0XG82sD4BGqqZedVJs1Xoq+jfBbFzmCukYgneraMSOuP/2K7BvdNb vJsbeQ4W7tCZ5iBhgTw+CxwwtJl19+Uc4yK3U2Ok4KW2VC4c70fGatlMQ E0cEAVaGzlucUXLinI3LLRbiAQXOXg9h31Z6mGB0dOllgzVZYfGzDgNun UDcmzFdgJf2+vocnch474G73NZLr2K3mFwnVEgGZCWBOsW3zrVrCCXQkC Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,244,1620684000"; d="scan'208";a="18490950" Received: from vtuxmail01.tq-net.de ([10.115.0.20]) by mx1.tq-group.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2021 11:23:55 +0200 Received: from schifferm-ubuntu4.tq-net.de (schifferm-ubuntu4.tq-net.de [10.121.48.12]) by vtuxmail01.tq-net.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 29A91280070; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:23:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] TQMx86: TQMx110EB and TQMxE40x MFD/GPIO support From: Matthias Schiffer To: Lee Jones Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andrew Lunn , Andy Shevchenko , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:23:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 10:20 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 02 Jul 2021, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > > > Updated patch series: > > > > - A number of new patches (more hardware support and a few fixes) > > - Patches 1-3 have gained Fixes tags > > - Patch 2 depends on 1, so maybe we can push the GPIO patch through the > > MFD tree to keep them together? > > - The change in patch 7 was somewhat controversial. I've added a > > warning, but it is the last patch of the series, so it doesn't affect > > the rest of the series if it is rejected. > > > > > > Matthias Schiffer (7): > > gpio: tqmx86: really make IRQ optional > > mfd: tqmx86: clear GPIO IRQ resource when no IRQ is set > > mfd: tqmx86: remove incorrect TQMx90UC board ID > > mfd: tqmx86: fix typo in "platform" > > mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMx110EB and TQMxE40x > > mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQ-Systems DMI IDs > > mfd: tqmx86: assume 24MHz LPC clock for unknown boards > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c | 6 ++--- > > drivers/mfd/tqmx86.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > Patches look good. > > Could you please collect up Andrew's acks, remove the suggested Fixes: > lines and resubmit please? Are you referring to the Fixes: line in "[PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: tqmx86: remove incorrect TQMx90UC board ID"? > > I'll quickly apply them once resent (probably Monday - if you get them > out today). > Thanks, I'll try to get it done today.