Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1152889pxv; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+6eCqmxiD8L05n0KjR1UR3oehe86aDlUAkjQ0COg+U+hk+7O9VszHPYmsAADcdLmSjtYW X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1406:: with SMTP id 6mr6810203iou.25.1626429280619; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626429280; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H4ubUWXvJv/GV2sNkC2BdV6sKsltyWhVab1sXWhRYLkdcYSSvn07DG3P8kPrdbw+1+ GD1KN0IyRQac7Nv8JP1ofdhB+uS4T9paH5taGbavky12l7+Y/YmmN/TZTuFWwALZV3aW 5eAIrz/uUJoyerg/xOTMxAtXU+1r0fBrdBUtCXOQVZYQyeU2XqP27J7ioi6+36GigwG3 /ubKa5F/LeSh6ewaDdTcPIrdWEmTvtz8KhV4ruK9IbPjuDnvovmGFjI3XVuJmKVi1eUA 1QXxBPELrtr4LqbiOEJNqylUEx4mevdkc37ccmiBRKlKySWVUlYXQD2IlhXyoWrVa9Cd jFyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=CImflvQXNPki7/CE/9foXgc1WHUNFXl5JV6C6ozlays=; b=wx3IocSU/FTiChLD7NeLRVCJoztk1T/uBct86Z1wTPWkrc92+k/MvzUL6nNoZpEzTV 0JujMiiUCpA3XVmNdzWVt9WwQbcc8OZ/met6/apLQS62etJ9idE29wneja0vbgMpwEpq l5dnOKTMQFIMUtGOWw+K+5p5Esv4rMUvVKtp6JNvwyx5Y+aJS9KrryE50uujQggSlg15 Yf46yV/JufKGpGYvEOd0Gy0ugSmC+XIZ0fF6CL9/dFwgqPf09wJW/nJ5w2QVaEsTWQUl KdDVjAcqbIR0a8tagEG66xfAcjRXSRCO77aPuKBdHy0AquvuBdaztVt62RXjemN1c85X XHnw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y9si9649547ilv.11.2021.07.16.02.54.27; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235200AbhGPJzk (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:55:40 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:51600 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231386AbhGPJzk (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:55:40 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 7E9641C0B82; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:52:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:52:43 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador , Naoya Horiguchi , Vlastimil Babka , David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 140/215] mm,hwpoison: return -EBUSY when migration fails Message-ID: <20210716095243.GA12505@amd> References: <20210715182558.381078833@linuxfoundation.org> <20210715182624.294004469@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210715182624.294004469@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > From: Oscar Salvador >=20 > commit 3f4b815a439adfb8f238335612c4b28bc10084d8 Another format of marking upstream commits. How are this is number 8 or so. I have scripts trying to parse this, and I don't believe I'm the only one. > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201209092818.30417-1-osalvador@suse.de > Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador > Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka > Cc: David Hildenbrand > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Could se simply place Upstream: tag here? That should discourage such "creativity"... plus it will make it clear who touched patch in mainline context and who in stable context. Best regards, Pavel --=20 http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmDxVusACgkQMOfwapXb+vL/ywCaA9AxmEi/0e539yr6i76sbWx0 PTYAoJr3uwgDGvyh8EZtZtKkqxlbnvni =4+Fo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--