Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1341555pxv; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:14:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNeT+MQqZNlajaVioodHUVOao1VraGyajSh1rN3156nIKVmvGX6Zvm0wRYFUfhH7SZYV/P X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:76cf:: with SMTP id q15mr12091131ejn.69.1626444874266; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:14:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626444874; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XUgNou8KAjaFyV4iFmpvhsNgMpuRS6sUxr+NFBBdsEJcqu4Q6A5ZXcLswTe66sTpol 2103oD1rqafcROZ8eSfRwI5F3ksRUaf2zYoXOpiKvDxWdK8ZlMc0A2bF8YqZ/+tWDBOH WQexnUjj6yE+ndE6JXU57lGwdNuFFaRKcu7zlVM25qyUbSZO9ahDCdEGLtigcgkvYFH3 dU55gDC7XLSlVWAT6LPfd4+xYoLXYsTE4VFsYHG1j0iS3yEcVXLTDgi3JgOsZbZhlEHw GUb38qUBBHzVxRqK6TSAyedMLI+XuRTDi9dOkWeCkyndca7dFJhNvVOGDHr7dH6hESyY GyQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=pSja3g8b/G8oENC4oTBUMbMyHODtxL/FGA8Tv2qfBbQ=; b=arLpMFePQgVXjDsaAK/6AK8tiXWdah2dMal/BSstEn5zFrf3p5K/NziAox+CjjQFuu 6eShtS9odWouyggui9IBAOL2NAvbeXq25YHUSGaDxL3fhp798tjwKYnFs92cMB7lfgPK YqRowb1S/uLXlFTHml/YO+QMXxn5WIy87BYNSHnXd+gUBgSHtleaT1okJRyzx0Pa1ESC KRAOwvALIKmCM20xjudY5AJu28D8k/SVofL+MMZl1Rr6PNEH3nIRJiGaZteeH8vIgRWI cwx+bsTH7CZijM3cAOEq8Yu1hr+rM0VMlaj+BZuxF5bjY5LoW76pq5lxVf6ORtTT+BS7 MKsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dz21si11429691edb.62.2021.07.16.07.14.08; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240366AbhGPOOm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:14:42 -0400 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:53245 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233212AbhGPOOk (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:14:40 -0400 Received: from fsav118.sakura.ne.jp (fsav118.sakura.ne.jp [27.133.134.245]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16GEATWZ036199; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 23:10:29 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav118.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav118.sakura.ne.jp); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 23:10:29 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/fsav118.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (M106072142033.v4.enabler.ne.jp [106.72.142.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 16GEASKV036196 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 23:10:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp) Subject: Re: [syzbot] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in profile_init To: Pavel Skripkin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, tglx@linutronix.de, syzbot References: <000000000000610af005c714c1d1@google.com> <20210716152440.368d4250@gmail.com> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: <949a12a0-a0a6-0574-4e87-4ed196ff6d78@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 23:10:25 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210716152440.368d4250@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/07/16 21:24, Pavel Skripkin wrote: > But this function can be called not only from sysfs and I can't > understand will my patch break something or not. And, I think, error > message is needed somewhere here to inform callers about wrong shift > value. > > > Thoughts? Subsequent profiling_store() attempts will return -EEXIST if profile_setup() once set prof_on to non-zero value. Therefore, if you try to return -EINVAL when profile_setup() returns 0, you need to make sure that prof_on is set to non-zero value only if prof_shift is valid. But, the userspace might not be aware of the value of MAX_PROF_SHIFT because it is an architecture dependent value, and par might become negative value because get_option() accepts negative value. Therefore, it might be better to + par = clamp(par, 0, MAX_PROF_SHIFT - 1); than + if (par < 0 || par >= MAX_PROF_SHIFT) + return 0; .