Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934001AbWKTIYo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:24:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934002AbWKTIYo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:24:44 -0500 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([62.242.22.158]:64564 "EHLO kernel.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934001AbWKTIYn (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:24:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:24:26 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Jim Schutt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: splice/vmsplice performance test results Message-ID: <20061120082426.GG4077@kernel.dk> References: <1163700539.2672.14.camel@sale659.sandia.gov> <20061116202529.GH7164@kernel.dk> <1163784110.8170.8.camel@sale659.sandia.gov> <20061120075941.GF4077@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061120075941.GF4077@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3303 Lines: 74 On Mon, Nov 20 2006, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17 2006, Jim Schutt wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 21:25 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 16 2006, Jim Schutt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > My test program can do one of the following: > > > > > > > > send data: > > > > A) read() from file into buffer, write() buffer into socket > > > > B) mmap() section of file, write() that into socket, munmap() > > > > C) splice() from file to pipe, splice() from pipe to socket > > > > > > > > receive data: > > > > 1) read() from socket into buffer, write() buffer into file > > > > 2) ftruncate() to extend file, mmap() new extent, read() > > > > from socket into new extent, munmap() > > > > 3) read() from socket into buffer, vmsplice() buffer to > > > > pipe, splice() pipe to file (using the double-buffer trick) > > > > > > > > Here's the results, using: > > > > - 64 KiB buffer, mmap extent, or splice > > > > - 1 MiB TCP window > > > > - 16 GiB data sent across network > > > > > > > > A) from /dev/zero -> 1) to /dev/null : 857 MB/s (6.86 Gb/s) > > > > > > > > A) from file -> 1) to /dev/null : 472 MB/s (3.77 Gb/s) > > > > B) from file -> 1) to /dev/null : 366 MB/s (2.93 Gb/s) > > > > C) from file -> 1) to /dev/null : 854 MB/s (6.83 Gb/s) > > > > > > > > A) from /dev/zero -> 1) to file : 375 MB/s (3.00 Gb/s) > > > > A) from /dev/zero -> 2) to file : 150 MB/s (1.20 Gb/s) > > > > A) from /dev/zero -> 3) to file : 286 MB/s (2.29 Gb/s) > > > > > > > > I had (naively) hoped the read/vmsplice/splice combination would > > > > run at the same speed I can write a file, i.e. at about 450 MB/s > > > > on my setup. Do any of my numbers seem bogus, so I should look > > > > harder at my test program? > > > > > > Could be read-ahead playing in here, I'd have to take a closer look at > > > the generated io patterns to say more about that. Any chance you can > > > capture iostat or blktrace info for such a run to compare that goes to > > > the disk? > > > > I've attached a file with iostat and vmstat results for the case > > where I read from a socket and write a file, vs. the case where I > > read from a socket and use vmsplice/splice to write the file. > > (Sorry it's not inline - my mailer locks up when I try to > > include the file.) > > > > Would you still like blktrace info for these two cases? > > No, I think the iostat data is fine, I don't think the blktrace info > would give me any more insight on this problem. I'll set up a test to > reproduce it here, looks like the write out path could be optimized some > more. While I get that setup, can you repeat your testing without using SPLICE_F_MORE (you don't really use that flag correctly, but it does not matter for your case afaict) and SPLICE_F_MOVE? The latter will cost some CPU, but vmsplice/splice for network receive to a file is not really optimal in the first place. When we get splice() from socket fd support that'll improve, right now you are doing the best you can. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/