Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1431371pxv; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:09:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwAAhcBWd+R+LcW5ESYJ7JWNTaJWaLzUlAEMOoLNzlequHS1Vgz/R11vHeNnQT44/Hpq7G4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:490c:: with SMTP id b12mr12820410ejq.7.1626451782835; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626451782; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x5roO0lj6Sph4qKHMkclPcN1HJuzOPuLDNyr1VsQlsC1KkSImSUXNcQGwPlx5e0Lw0 QUPqYdHWT+gzVXMP/bhWenXv5eobHGIY3JSStRYqR2ApLyLoqLMhx3tSJ6UFjQHic2H4 aSDuU3n5uOs7wG5t1Nu1SK+gM7viEfeF9J039fyiiFppomx+Zlwm+ebiWrXwBLrCRT5j MYITwmpH3wBpelBGPu7NBBcnYnDhbh6YHUI12oc1D6v7tK9kcU1Ezr1oAOXuDymRa/lZ iMD2rawwD0eyXH/mZ4pVQrPHzU4mvaSnWvKiDTkQ0kl/bF9WikHlkZEvexAcl9YMSeWQ z3RQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=7o+ZXiY1x4HxG0NX7nQFj0s+5uNTIRTu5mkV45m8eGA=; b=igF4vG1CPafpAIhrd42IA3+4SwHwtpW8WOPMTZk4obdNHmr8VYMMz3WQsJsg9tgDpI Ee4xv5iTG2ZrE80AtqK9UpjFDx9xbrJe+pd4+lFIGNjuK6yBWMhsvoSajaFMPjXyzRIW BPMlVRJ7JlCskhz5KkSD1CdoBEPP7CePdWps0/2pePi76Zh7VQK5pSZGX8xYaqqBTH9W 1HHbjdTAxR2W+JRpQ7zlYc1PHGV05MOZA1UhSUsBDhfV465oqWIx0ExQLMNCmLID2nO7 16fD3m8E/p9U4R96cdd7KsB38t9bWzJiGXWbvXFI4a0gZoObuY2WxOkI4rpb36fVb45d JUdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt26si11912408ejb.208.2021.07.16.09.09.19; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231223AbhGPQKh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:10:37 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:34550 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229600AbhGPQKg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:10:36 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m4QNH-00EEks-IT; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:07:39 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:59864 helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m4QNG-00DJ88-HV; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:07:39 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Marco Elver Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Florian Weimer , "David S. Miller" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Collingbourne , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , sparclinux , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , kasan-dev References: <87a6mnzbx2.fsf_-_@disp2133> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:07:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6mnzbx2.fsf_-_@disp2133> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:09:45 -0500") Message-ID: <87zgumw8cc.fsf_-_@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1m4QNG-00DJ88-HV;;;mid=<87zgumw8cc.fsf_-_@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18CKNIyNviV1k7gAbzUP2/IleOeAtTE1RM= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.7 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,LotsOfNums_01,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, XMGappySubj_01,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4972] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 1.2 LotsOfNums_01 BODY: Lots of long strings of numbers * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;Marco Elver X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 482 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (2.2%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.9%), parse: 0.91 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (2.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 2.2 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 14 (3.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.28 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.01 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 117 (24.3%), check_bayes: 116 (24.0%), b_tokenize: 10 (2.1%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.6%), b_comp_prob: 2.0 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 92 (19.1%), b_finish: 0.94 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 313 (64.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.62 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 0.71 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 8/6] signal: Rename SIL_PERF_EVENT SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT for consistency X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It helps to know which part of the siginfo structure the siginfo_layout value is talking about. v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/m18s4zs7nu.fsf_-_@fess.ebiederm.org v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210505141101.11519-9-ebiederm@xmission.com Acked-by: Marco Elver Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman --- fs/signalfd.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/signal.h | 2 +- kernel/signal.c | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/signalfd.c b/fs/signalfd.c index 167b5889db4b..040e1cf90528 100644 --- a/fs/signalfd.c +++ b/fs/signalfd.c @@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct signalfd_siginfo __user *uinfo, break; case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR: case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR: - case SIL_PERF_EVENT: + case SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT: /* * Fall through to the SIL_FAULT case. SIL_FAULT_BNDERR, - * SIL_FAULT_PKUERR, and SIL_PERF_EVENT are only + * SIL_FAULT_PKUERR, and SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT are only * generated by faults that deliver them synchronously to * userspace. In case someone injects one of these signals * and signalfd catches it treat it as SIL_FAULT. diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h index 3454c7ff0778..3f96a6374e4f 100644 --- a/include/linux/signal.h +++ b/include/linux/signal.h @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ enum siginfo_layout { SIL_FAULT_MCEERR, SIL_FAULT_BNDERR, SIL_FAULT_PKUERR, - SIL_PERF_EVENT, + SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT, SIL_CHLD, SIL_RT, SIL_SYS, diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 2181423e562a..332b21f2fe72 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static inline bool has_si_pid_and_uid(struct kernel_siginfo *info) case SIL_FAULT_MCEERR: case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR: case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR: - case SIL_PERF_EVENT: + case SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT: case SIL_SYS: ret = false; break; @@ -2580,7 +2580,7 @@ static void hide_si_addr_tag_bits(struct ksignal *ksig) case SIL_FAULT_MCEERR: case SIL_FAULT_BNDERR: case SIL_FAULT_PKUERR: - case SIL_PERF_EVENT: + case SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT: ksig->info.si_addr = arch_untagged_si_addr( ksig->info.si_addr, ksig->sig, ksig->info.si_code); break; @@ -3265,7 +3265,7 @@ enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(unsigned sig, int si_code) layout = SIL_FAULT_PKUERR; #endif else if ((sig == SIGTRAP) && (si_code == TRAP_PERF)) - layout = SIL_PERF_EVENT; + layout = SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT; else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARC) && (sig == SIGILL) && (si_code == ILL_ILLTRP)) layout = SIL_FAULT_TRAPNO; @@ -3394,7 +3394,7 @@ void copy_siginfo_to_external32(struct compat_siginfo *to, to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr); to->si_pkey = from->si_pkey; break; - case SIL_PERF_EVENT: + case SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT: to->si_addr = ptr_to_compat(from->si_addr); to->si_perf_data = from->si_perf_data; to->si_perf_type = from->si_perf_type; @@ -3471,7 +3471,7 @@ static int post_copy_siginfo_from_user32(kernel_siginfo_t *to, to->si_addr = compat_ptr(from->si_addr); to->si_pkey = from->si_pkey; break; - case SIL_PERF_EVENT: + case SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT: to->si_addr = compat_ptr(from->si_addr); to->si_perf_data = from->si_perf_data; to->si_perf_type = from->si_perf_type; -- 2.20.1