Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1432023pxv; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:10:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4PTsNWc1AULFwMOmInODJl6c2zf1rwFQbCq6tVc9/+QL5i4weQkgu9hFCH0uccSpC5kc1 X-Received: by 2002:adf:d086:: with SMTP id y6mr13880847wrh.247.1626451828982; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:10:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626451828; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bb4eH45NxnVGqz6bWls4RlNEKw9fOc30LkyLAPS50Jx8raohil+qwvCFYEOTlSKwei L+u6eVBcjSzCRz0CyXf1wPG5yP7Q09Jej/qQ2c9IHLfFALKdTRdHGJ7O3lO+T8H/xbz5 ZCRum/4esquuvXjW1g2ww0JyhVRTP6FeUTF5IJd04DpXmNUzH/4LtMMpPtfIFoHDpc1p m9twXOnQT3bfSQGSBq2oQy4foAaoXKScKz1uIWF/0cli31FHbHuv2UVZld9dtlz+hNfx x3Wa1mxj6wVQnziB0fzhunoBG6l3ELhv1Rd3EbtdmTBuEuV+60R55sKU3KQBkObndp2m 87xg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=bDIP5OVgqC58ZlkI9+SMnuUcLkQ8b09jCLuxVM9rhKs=; b=YrUt3dUeM66pLkHvbSQeqsLD3eUOj30U4nAPmUGKxNhxsKwC33gCaT5Kl2Ndv73zCt m3dZCgMXBzFn2Bcm436w7Vku3KG9jKiyWQzHvMpRF4cSgK8t2LRPE6pteFdy5kCuXB+H CRHD4EPYrRLN+rwBTM3hSy1KP3TvA74Z0/FTmAy6p6Hyw/KJqB2psvFGk5HTBZR1cU9s O+xqEXGAcU5+ksmtZOi5p96BaoOvXS7HTE/ObXjrgiTkHBvVMVagNQwh+BzEktouJhK/ I9EWA7FHJ41Takvl9YVMpf4TTnYLs2QGLtt1L0w2aEtCv1lIdkILCiyQrN45XnXuXFLL PqJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec55si11491905edb.572.2021.07.16.09.10.05; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229603AbhGPQL7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:11:59 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:52968 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229545AbhGPQL6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:11:58 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m4QOb-00BwDX-PT; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:09:01 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:59932 helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m4QOZ-00DJJg-2j; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 10:09:01 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Marco Elver Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Florian Weimer , "David S. Miller" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Collingbourne , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , sparclinux , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , kasan-dev References: <87a6mnzbx2.fsf_-_@disp2133> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:08:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Marco Elver's message of "Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:50:04 +0200") Message-ID: <87tukuw8a3.fsf@disp2133> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1m4QOZ-00DJJg-2j;;;mid=<87tukuw8a3.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+jrqvcI+IK382ie8tjYdZOnNBk1i6LALk= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_05, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.5 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 1 to 5% * [score: 0.0243] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Marco Elver X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 406 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (2.4%), b_tie_ro: 8 (2.0%), parse: 0.85 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 3.1 (0.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.46 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.9 (1.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.16 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.96 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 97 (24.0%), check_bayes: 96 (23.6%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.8%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 76 (18.6%), b_finish: 0.77 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 271 (66.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.50 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.7%), poll_dns_idle: 0.87 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.3 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 8 (2.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Final si_trapno bits X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marco Elver writes: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 01:09PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> As a part of a fix for the ABI of the newly added SIGTRAP TRAP_PERF a >> si_trapno was reduced to an ordinary extention of the _sigfault case >> of struct siginfo. >> >> When Linus saw the complete set of changes come in as a fix he requested >> that the set of changes be trimmed down to just what was necessary to >> fix the SIGTRAP TRAP_PERF ABI. >> >> I had intended to get the rest of the changes into the merge window for >> v5.14 but I dropped the ball. >> >> I have made the changes to stop using __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO be per >> architecture so they are easier to review. In doing so I found one >> place on alpha where I used send_sig_fault instead of >> send_sig_fault_trapno(... si_trapno = 0). That would not have changed >> the userspace behavior but it did make the kernel code less clear. >> >> My rule in these patches is everywhere that siginfo layout calls >> for SIL_FAULT_TRAPNO the code uses either force_sig_fault_trapno >> or send_sig_fault_trapno. >> >> And of course I have rebased and compile tested Marco's compile time >> assert patches. >> >> Eric >> >> >> Eric W. Biederman (3): >> signal/sparc: si_trapno is only used with SIGILL ILL_ILLTRP >> signal/alpha: si_trapno is only used with SIGFPE and SIGTRAP TRAP_UNK >> signal: Remove the generic __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO support >> >> Marco Elver (3): >> sparc64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets >> arm: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets >> arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets > > Nice, thanks for the respin. If I diffed it right, I see this is almost > (modulo what you mentioned above) equivalent to: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/m1tuni8ano.fsf_-_@fess.ebiederm.org/ > + what's already in mainline. It's only missing: > > signal: Verify the alignment and size of siginfo_t > signal: Rename SIL_PERF_EVENT SIL_FAULT_PERF_EVENT for consistency > > Would this be appropriate for this series, or rather separately, or > dropped completely? Appropriate I just overlooked them. Eric