Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2312756pxv; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:58:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZpQdE+Q7fb/gmB/QaQDLMLg0vnYO+S3lUK4MyQnUsDjHuYA4vaeVTAhScGfi3GN/NUuas X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1406:: with SMTP id 6mr11961604iou.25.1626541085915; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626541085; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DLoBmNSkBL4ySUUEJylrS2rASC4f5Cw2z20NxHdEmprlYxnvHL7dFvP6uQzE+lJhCD bBJen46hG5CDTlilYPmw1687RkzbrZ+LfptWY4rjmGtSRZemO7feFEkBsBSRwpwbTEwA Qwp9Tyror31PETxb022LbBhpRR1yLpdyWwcHBkxN3wp4Agtkr3UbCbXJQ99UIWIqP+tR 433wBkHiUYfYqTrwmOoWHQmybYz03I1/RMxASkulirH5CmcC/4b6del0jD+LVqVzJwcA W+j4hGgOF43LxQI/lGsRGLMMxIw+beJRX1Roi7MlbJy47o2Q0IXcbPQ8fM9qxyTbzih1 v0Ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=pj/AGrTlEcCJ35fQfn5T5dPDSjyDRRUGItXgecdSyDU=; b=hsmX+DsuT8JvBwjqcwYDBpMaJLJHdcGnI8GSkIPP3i9R3Sz5kE19vHJyoUKOmwf9kM G6cNyLiTP2CC4Mm4vrC9nPameHi2AKqmGyLsG9YuVOOWJgablC09rhdVgv5XGx0c0aAk 6DzziAzoniyQz2tziE5t4kacb/eX4pezfLeqSy1SYbBwTYxoJfnGUBwq1vnttHLgfo6G 4RL8WBQSBsO21DF9AbFOwT459fZuYoyYBZDqpciMSMxjHvy+apG2X64Z2JfB69Bw08oI mIeXLHI+e63guUE40TfUEyolYCS18tSGaNBbkjfBipXq63gy1pE+PbtJ2nVuD1fKEqe/ 68eA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t3si14761458ile.109.2021.07.17.09.57.50; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232544AbhGQRAB (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:00:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42064 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229581AbhGQRAA (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:00:00 -0400 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C9B3610F9; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:59:25 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: lars@metafoo.de, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: buffer: Move a sanity check at the beginning of 'iio_scan_mask_set()' Message-ID: <20210717175925.17091e96@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <98a351adda1908c306e981b9cc86d3dbc79eb5ec.1626261211.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> References: <89d8a766eb971eda1ee362444a8711037bdb208c.1626261211.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> <98a351adda1908c306e981b9cc86d3dbc79eb5ec.1626261211.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.18.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:14:51 +0200 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > This is more standard to have sanity checks at the entry of a function, > instead of allocating some memory first and having to free it if a > condition is not met. Indeed this is silly. I'd guess result of code evolution, but perhaps I was crazy in the first place :) Applied, Thanks, Jonathan > > Shuffle code a bit to check 'masklength' before calling 'bitmap_alloc()' > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET > --- > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c > index 6d4776a7f002..a95cc2da56be 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c > @@ -354,13 +354,14 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > const unsigned long *mask; > unsigned long *trialmask; > > - trialmask = bitmap_alloc(indio_dev->masklength, GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!trialmask) > - return -ENOMEM; > if (!indio_dev->masklength) { > WARN(1, "Trying to set scanmask prior to registering buffer\n"); > - goto err_invalid_mask; > + return -EINVAL; > } > + > + trialmask = bitmap_alloc(indio_dev->masklength, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!trialmask) > + return -ENOMEM; > bitmap_copy(trialmask, buffer->scan_mask, indio_dev->masklength); > set_bit(bit, trialmask); >