Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2782418pxv; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxftxupzS1rewjiSizttAe+U2kBhbOrMoqThzIDsm/g4md0VdgvqHqc/bQjfCYPAjwqymvL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58c7:: with SMTP id e7mr21253437ejs.197.1626597149136; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626597149; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kyHvBftR5K2IWbT/HBvRG7/35wEQ9gbB0VbSoiTCHXe3dJC714mqeZl/EkghJW/ptG avQokd9u5DZ19rx3zbZxcg01Z+Wgnz/0PBpm0Okq4XO1+LlBFMkOvn4geDuHXfRbtpkx MUSGnG8PVzEbHMviEpb3U/chPQUNWD+yCmoTkodXk0e9Wm0SqnyHtPoQ9VKeySmqrY6s RDuHhcR/Y2EIOBtTxrMwBEK8jEtPtmIdWLA4JQiMKjIUGccd7+IS9SMJ3JLFkLnu97+8 hqdr8fJPq7mMX+0aDrSqEv3GMq98e7JbiquMAp8BLGkvV4YXG4ecWeMu8A+berX4wpdE rxkg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:dkim-signature; bh=xCCGi9+kx/Z6rDBPDh+EMhPeDPw7nxiIzKH6wdyJNqc=; b=Sdf6kZ+2EESCcybCzS8KuKQqdvg5TLDdrt276+aoPP3XbzylFgIDIzzU4iHf9YMuG0 BVtuHUx4UXLCQyb/bwgCB8bvwe9Tad04FbRdh9y9DAICvPbW1vSEmIxgeo5ZGW7FBCSB pfIDRZXzFLWR72cy+oNeygCca9VplIsmad96b0XMkcmDHI5WFwZcxoDJSwT6N98nEV+I sCltTVLNRlmG6wihXVwpAjh1wacbNHL67wfwn4yHviuPx3Ue1+1rGaYUPMN2q6S+6lOM 5Bpss3HEWzcHE3KF45YonC95IHGOBa+7YrM/uP/0Xq24IzpiNxOCw0Wa9aIhKrloExH2 xvRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=SVF8uOrJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmx.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o7si17098654eja.372.2021.07.18.01.31.51; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 01:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmx.net header.s=badeba3b8450 header.b=SVF8uOrJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmx.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229842AbhGRIdF (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:33:05 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:55411 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229578AbhGRIdE (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jul 2021 04:33:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1626596972; bh=C3fcgolBPCedQ4D/+2yjkrUfly9qUKkzLQRI38gnXHI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=SVF8uOrJptlEy8CVf02KS8Z+FVgkzDLxKYeKuLmxDpJa1Yqr4M/8wPKnnufzsdJiv EtSei88k0Dq+goFlyagQt2uRqH//bOpAkg3/XUYe7s7hsT01gYj/D/6aNwjoTjOD3R qF0geb1qDUaHtVOZccvZlQw12ySP9c12j7NgelTE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from homer.fritz.box ([185.221.148.250]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MTzay-1ldypd3rAw-00Qyjq; Sun, 18 Jul 2021 10:29:32 +0200 Message-ID: <64eda4de845c8d98e0dcb7f6fa3177037120e317.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/34] SLUB: reduce irq disabled scope and make it RT compatible From: Mike Galbraith To: Vlastimil Babka , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Joonsoo Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Mel Gorman , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Peter Zijlstra , Jann Horn Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 10:29:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20210609113903.1421-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20210702182944.lqa7o2a25to6czju@linutronix.de> <891dc24e38106f8542f4c72831d52dc1a1863ae8.camel@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:d/PpY/pSlP89e6xkF6+DLWyRoolVhRkrqKuKZngBrPjkaZDXmv0 x2Zs2T37BPv1BPLqoimnU0QP8hDl50p7tJzdBXMNT4khvFQWje+QnL6BBk5aha+bpeBkADl PPXQskXTT+WczYLebDwWrJIi7SYKvLNvVTF5fLW+s7KMm2VulzCVBQpAHYdN8zkaJTZTBOx FAQFKa9uoOruX46n7MoLg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:VMIpsfVM0uQ=:E+L/pFjyeV1dQu/kkE5be+ 5LH6iTiMMufwwTnSm3sCNVuLZVJFekQqBRBWv09XTj36kWJmWbFZS9uy5sh4Gb4qjt6SdUDeA lEjjbYmx8LzV3ChpCvEfoSvieHDRS+o31nbLwvOE4UwDdU9t7zTlMq+ZTclvRhD4/5mDVMdRB Aj57qJlYXffUdlbGpdHJawlxhKodbK6avosZTySvhz6ZNLprGD4I+w3T5ZGbMnw9cxY8hMnXt SsfTJrlIfdoFVhKdxkrhp9EQCm593mtuX8fktcDiTazE2vdyhJp03MZGunF4YXctpgYF0MNMU +ameMF5QEDnJqyeRXruFrrL8NnlHgJawl37edl7y0ARSrQ6Zhpw6MF0rWirX3NyWbYXUquJ/y XfSdVdcXILyL8zR2pbhGsCZEUT48liZvBMyIFUjTPXIvE3rvz2asMMruAF0Nr2AsTjkOmgxDK GXGWoZxA7wM35IkJ+yReSxR6Dwm5nOxnKCW3qN9rbbABKFW6HTpDbEK3m9y4ECBR/bE4KXhTN JinikKEAAEcS9FcNkNTBl/nliGNrYadCBrNejCVz6G6LX60dXuMq7qQhuVhrONwO8Ug+cmC48 JQIGhz178WLLNtSymgQxjWWxsJZvhzdl0Hsi3PW8LnxZq9HgeoAdTXhwqSHxzekvJUWWFMo8C Gm290Ir2gzpOGP/kovjOgSQaMQzQBl0IVR7KdqUhA1EskXehD0KDf3C1aUDmDL3CnnUnMTAaV +PatDUbcgMfFSZSWcBdQBeRtO8v1BONweHKHyIVJaSTCP39lwjFlSYopXkvXgvuUwWnvLCaWP 0qXFo2qscfuZjhq0iUtWuaf7Vx16ockPpF08RjKeM5kKxXfh5sDpxU1lFA4GELsZmm1GUtgOz WN0UZiKXeNQ7SR79WhWzkRqPyAbnONddr8GAmSCOGSqSnLKwBNe0uxb3HMkTiAwSYNWb3c694 bu/OuipZth8xvHOHPeN0UZhm4cyWBBSubhiUxlpVq2FNQWuQk/ud1jO25HKYc+5MEDMGthiKk ej5JH93P8MQQxJn8n9fnVJGxIDMJroeZpBPntDAPH4Ohbugh4CEucyAU3TbXZKXiIb+GVCmB1 ttIXum2z1ptkSxInsOgMCxoMQyyfbYjO981 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2021-07-18 at 09:41 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 7/3/21 9:24 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 20:29 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > I replaced my slub changes with slub-local-lock-v2r3. > > > I haven't seen any complains from lockdep or so which is good. > > > Then I > > > did this with RT enabled (and no debug): > > > > Below is some raw hackbench data from my little i4790 desktop > > box. It > > says we'll definitely still want list_lock to be raw. > > Hi Mike, thanks a lot for the testing, sorry for late reply. > > Did you try, instead of raw list_lock, not applying the last, local > lock patch, as I suggested in reply to bigeasy? No, but I suppose I can give that a go. -Mike