Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3490280pxv; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:08:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0k+hr3OSoWSdnC/DL4Uee56LKn3xqYsOYuaHxk4lcL8RfBdg94IeewF7OsgbQiPeLqXUt X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1057:: with SMTP id e23mr33407225edu.352.1626682093551; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:08:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626682093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GJFGBnfs9bvWaSgtJ+3IagopltgTYrWgq2LdN12xi52E70U81FfMbIO1jiMB3Ppsi0 FowRmrpmMgze2UEN31Ta2BD77HvI3BeW+mp0r/QymxqnyDNjmlPUbKRaVacloAuLMXo8 0vJzNBHjWeY4A9NNttDSCk8UdzrjLG72mdGIzODph0/IC8mViWt5D1vklSLC8cx7cFQ5 mM7I5ScsKwzuAUTiAc7YuExZmOrM460ud/8223NHh7oGRfrtXbssXFybFAO3SrmIO6YP FL00lMqwrUVQqQem+pN2HTZIgY3OnnsgNEI1pqBIQr8Yco0/2+DKgknJLiNYO8lVDYOd cK8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=7EMzH3aAsHkgh4oi6xqy9qUOqO8CbBG7b1bzqeCZMWU=; b=POOqtFTpH2AEJ9zFHAfifS+jiuI1GlKuhGp5swZ9dRlGWoHhOAMU//LPfvpwKa2G6S orn19Hs0kvVRyE5zTtu5iPWu8ErrnBxVhhekV3URJU1vHAr2UaDCORUp9DTIPXGk7ab9 a8ZtwM080dp2y9AqRhpIuZqndNy0fBRgye8UGx6Lixdw/8aGsPjmJIPfjeJ7lvi3YMIn bjJtpquhYap//u5W6ZAh5lP6Fn1GSJ9uz98egJKOf/c9+oV49XUWbAf1YSCFUAoX07BD hRmRppt9oVZKnh7C4GYLeBusapAicXBF2/7VDwZHtReoqG+kvFffY30I3kvASDVfRGP3 8HJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="QmF/6AEU"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lx14si10860162ejb.416.2021.07.19.01.07.51; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="QmF/6AEU"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235278AbhGSIJ2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 04:09:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57212 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235276AbhGSIJZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 04:09:25 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC45AC0613DD for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id a12so28738433lfb.7 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:06:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7EMzH3aAsHkgh4oi6xqy9qUOqO8CbBG7b1bzqeCZMWU=; b=QmF/6AEU+CeklpqEfSixTUxLuHjmhtOIhJLUi0gaDtnbU4LFHke9We2fcWDJCU23Av oRcOiC0em74DTMzbEkMS1lAuvEF4jq/T3cyvdjLORjNZLkHLc97R8cL2dlb4gF/i4GFk r0cHOJ0QepwM1K2l5hxl/Uo8yRJzyYEBmnlABG6XRHwswY2IxeSDn3GoflBHyicH/kjS c5u55X/xWb3h0kvVCycWaqv8ggs4JnzdWF6SuexKwjLHlBg6Na8onXn2BHMK8w+LBwS5 XTibeJJEIviVkmwmufbtTVARh/26ukJIxandpLeLUkUfI/o1CC18qMYadOQYT1YRwZgf UYRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7EMzH3aAsHkgh4oi6xqy9qUOqO8CbBG7b1bzqeCZMWU=; b=Z5thbP6vmL6IdKLYVcM86dgMq33+1XroC0GHbOGzu5nbKJ3C9B5X4LfMNFzwmKmFRE 6jjQcvPFEsEwyTDCmGbCpfjvFw0NZq8qNLnzKQ+i4KMoOXNvR9GrZj7GzqWO/NWH62lY v2Z9cj/c1UsGcc3PnBoZtaOHfgB8dGZxCTR7a66dW41J32p2Gc9rrLsNoWCiwAieQZgh XmK2IcFqp8E929v+MfgytfXz3QznodTrkAOYwGrLyQARjtG85PSXAdj+vfST+R6RcEXX tRLqrFRB3AaEWmIDvzyZv+QT+eJ+XmF0cvLv9NbchhuZ1D6Pk6gY+uflB9wCvcPUq2Mo zRSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531R2ASppNv/1OUqFmm26vPO7TeIzdrMFebpvovy49bv/bDlb1v0 OPHcnUOuln8YZO3h3jUMI4x7ogXkvsf43YZbmwPnSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2115:: with SMTP id q21mr17559808lfr.546.1626681981148; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 01:06:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210716081722.4130161-1-andreas@rammhold.de> <0a684d56-66d0-184e-4853-9faafa2d243d@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <0a684d56-66d0-184e-4853-9faafa2d243d@pengutronix.de> From: Sumit Garg Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:36:09 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: Fix trusted key backends when building as module To: Ahmad Fatoum Cc: Andreas Rammhold , James Bottomley , Jarkko Sakkinen , Mimi Zohar , David Howells , James Morris , "Serge E . Hallyn" , linux-integrity , "open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" , "open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pengutronix Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 12:40, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > Hello Andreas, > > On 16.07.21 10:17, Andreas Rammhold wrote: > > Before this commit the kernel could end up with no trusted key sources > > even thought both of the currently supported backends (tpm & tee) were > > compoiled as modules. This manifested in the trusted key type not being > > registered at all. > > I assume (TPM) trusted key module use worked before the TEE rework? If so= , > > an appropriate Fixes: Tag would then be in order. > > > When checking if a CONFIG_=E2=80=A6 preprocessor variable is defined we= only > > test for the builtin (=3Dy) case and not the module (=3Dm) case. By usi= ng > > the IS_ENABLE(=E2=80=A6) macro we to test for both cases. > > It looks to me like you could now provoke a link error if TEE is a module > and built-in trusted key core tries to link against trusted_key_tee_ops. > That's true. > One solution for that IS_REACHABLE(). Another is to address the root caus= e, > which is the inflexible trusted keys Kconfig description: > > - Trusted keys despite TEE support can still only be built when TCG_TPM i= s enabled > - There is no support to have TEE or TPM enabled without using those for > enabled trusted keys as well > - As you noticed, module build of the backend has issues > > I addressed these three issues in a patch[1], a month ago, but have yet t= o > receive feedback. That's an oversight on my part since this patch was part of the new CAAM trust source patch-set. Although I do admit that it was on my TODO list. So I have provided some feedback on that patch. Can you post the next version as an independent fix patch? -Sumit > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/f8285eb0135ba30c9d846cf9dd39= 5d1f5f8b1efc.1624364386.git-series.a.fatoum@pengutronix.de/ > > Cheers, > Ahmad > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Rammhold > > --- > > security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c b/security/keys/= trusted-keys/trusted_core.c > > index d5c891d8d353..fd640614b168 100644 > > --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c > > +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c > > @@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ module_param_named(source, trusted_key_source, char= p, 0); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(source, "Select trusted keys source (tpm or tee)"); > > > > static const struct trusted_key_source trusted_key_sources[] =3D { > > -#if defined(CONFIG_TCG_TPM) > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TCG_TPM) > > { "tpm", &trusted_key_tpm_ops }, > > #endif > > -#if defined(CONFIG_TEE) > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEE) > > { "tee", &trusted_key_tee_ops }, > > #endif > > }; > > > > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | = | > Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ = | > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 = | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 = |