Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3742592pxv; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQWOGkSCI9yhIn0Jh6s9ifgDHviK1ozJStMNOSadF7E0ycK0dZOKZB9dtF2qImF7nq9h0q X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:805:: with SMTP id e5mr28396177ejd.310.1626705825440; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626705825; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r1Lik2LRAGxtI+daTIBVtEBTkQwGPvmUar73B8hpvACa2OYzwt9FRwbV7TQSiMiweY PMYmLUK58NZwiP8dw2YSwLa3qkylYdIwlcdF6XDcfNR7NOo8RemUCwzvDqxslxz0hvfG p3BOdt55poBJHmNYGEzXCkpWoRKZ9MsrGYDPsyR1XXDkmn+VGlH5pYRwhqPMaxiTwl0i YNDt5S+LfbFb7ZveD9ApaL2wtuZuyE9Atlj1NelmD+uKUux0zCC2ie0RBrjjZAN5j9Od VnFB6YnR41MGJoiLpsnGOtED9VSWubRcE4BDAQ3/ITnNbjyLNZ80v0Ovt96A9FiwiUAS ZFXg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:organization:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from; bh=/BY/eD0uFzovA8FucPu4k62b6yQZ9/dVjCQQzplVDG4=; b=KcwaD8/TWYAWmBJCjYZ7AtcZlrphZvfBGxJ89uo3XKCiJWO/VwrqDaUqCm07aI4mFn 5DakQ9TWUukjySQHCvwJwYvDWSk1quiFAwxO0wHJjGx87OAaV3PmTmVqogj+mCPg20xy fGgyfk1eYRwah8hfw1zLNAL+y86a2ymsg9ZVkVCdKQoE/vOgGEa0oprhgMhIicA4Ap56 wW/SHXgss6KBVewS3Yx/Te4V/LU2M13TAhXNH/yRy0bIhuYoMeHOFN5JmupLreA/MuqP tiZ3OYXuBV+CcypBj0rnlTbU1+kg64HJICdOANzzmDjINeHtwvNuts0bgg6Sfb/OdOka rRMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e21si21611915ejd.669.2021.07.19.07.43.21; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241011AbhGSOBo convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:01:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55752 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232531AbhGSOBo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:01:44 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 405 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:09:51 PDT Received: from ursule.remlab.net (vps-a2bccee9.vps.ovh.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:305:2100::8a0c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F47C061574 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 07:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ursule.remlab.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ursule.remlab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E484C022F; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:36:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: from basile.remlab.net ([2001:14ba:a01a:be01:9434:f69e:d553:3be2]) by ursule.remlab.net with ESMTPSA id oJWJDNeN9WBgcQAAwZXkwQ (envelope-from ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:36:07 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi?= Denis-Courmont To: courmisch@gmail.com, Yajun Deng Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: Adjustment parameters in rtnl_notify() Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:36:06 +0300 Message-ID: <5299846.uZDWVASI8p@basile.remlab.net> Organization: Remlab In-Reply-To: <20210719122506.5414-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> References: <20210719122506.5414-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Le maanantaina 19. heinäkuuta 2021, 15.25.06 EEST Yajun Deng a écrit : > The fifth parameter alread modify from 'struct nlmsghdr *nlh' to > 'int report', just adjustment them. I can't see that anywhere in the patch. > Add the case the nlh variable is NULL in nlmsg_report(). > > Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng > diff --git a/net/phonet/pn_netlink.c b/net/phonet/pn_netlink.c > index 59aebe296890..03e04d0b8453 100644 > --- a/net/phonet/pn_netlink.c > +++ b/net/phonet/pn_netlink.c > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ void phonet_address_notify(int event, struct net_device > *dev, u8 addr) goto errout; > } > rtnl_notify(skb, dev_net(dev), 0, > - RTNLGRP_PHONET_IFADDR, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); > + RTNLGRP_PHONET_IFADDR, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > return; > errout: > rtnl_set_sk_err(dev_net(dev), RTNLGRP_PHONET_IFADDR, err); > @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void rtm_phonet_notify(int event, struct net_device > *dev, u8 dst) goto errout; > } > rtnl_notify(skb, dev_net(dev), 0, > - RTNLGRP_PHONET_ROUTE, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); > + RTNLGRP_PHONET_ROUTE, 0, GFP_KERNEL); > return; > errout: > rtnl_set_sk_err(dev_net(dev), RTNLGRP_PHONET_ROUTE, err); Sorry but I don't like to replace explicit NULL pointers with implicitly converted zeroes. -- 雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙 http://www.remlab.net/