Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3761076pxv; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:09:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTNhcTZtdLZaUbIIc7i7SZSVRM+bZsNkKazjbj/4zQsAnJS3mCMsuOkEyfmDg1gRDTwXuh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:338f:: with SMTP id h15mr22227116jav.135.1626707362696; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:09:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626707362; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iCA3sYNINKPLZTMmYFPySYB59X3pjjWAW/PpzLYOT2EaMMhPGUSfmgIBGAMljSmOYl TBLjht3PKjO2RCKF4D2oQ2VVyWrS/TRVrAlML/636HVuCqiQxCwiVft340eVms3px18a g1z2erUeTKdf5DsQ73QruvEdZhOs6ch13hFqvC9EZJos0WUpAhfijLZ/GoWDu8jRWqXa ljWQ29zRiZoKosYMJGQtHHTxwOOizPeoKW7djIGQ6UEVmihb6vPyQ2SE1YJgpStgzVcx 3sYNrGV4DphPgUKNfkCOiwiMmXIl+osZek2gM/7d8r1Xfzhp8pZ/G2/jkYcAxMnZURly q9lQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=eMVHoCVbij4D7ExePBHqjICHBH7r1NDfa6IelN5hB74=; b=chaYzv/3p+1+oGFIaLKAe7EFr4sRp2UOjnDtMArRh1wIbUm8/TPxaoGgDJvMQqbJdY wl3eumGfQAQXzxoqMxC90EJO8US5igOIu+EJGjOy+odGppvZPh5FDmig82nT6BD9N6uk B82rdUJCrEW+rsDyllIWY4+EP5WZb3CX0pEPrhQu4HPa/4YXR3uvVJK9bZvlKvn5tivM OWBmXqRdfCxWVyd2v63d6/lFpwLFuhMzxXQCXCPSPZpRSNIZ5WTi3OxYC6c9e1K+Bg0N yd3Bf4VGKDx5vEGO+F3Dh1KokMyjILcJt2unMk4rFAwX2C5IMF+WpuO5/Kym4Ed9lyoE UtPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=iPrMwU1i; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v5si21533660jan.37.2021.07.19.08.09.11; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=iPrMwU1i; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243042AbhGSO2B (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:28:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56618 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242337AbhGSOWt (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:22:49 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B6C061205; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:02:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626706974; bh=K/um/lfJ9Ws0nA0pA/xXEP7knKZgHoSKQ7OfxnKKJuY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iPrMwU1iGGJE1shVfdeqRbqd34E4XKWp7ZaU98+OnKGC5O9Q5KFvPYyK46Dqmgm8v HP47OepmEOTbHdn+QGFd+QvO8yu1+BRLPsw2QvAGk7jFje563ATI/rgwaYhH4sh/k7 Uv5bMRV4Iz/ee3Uc0RjKTrSjH11IyA71GWZuShKo= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , Ilya Dryomov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.4 171/188] ceph: remove bogus checks and WARN_ONs from ceph_set_page_dirty Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:52:35 +0200 Message-Id: <20210719144942.086181921@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210719144913.076563739@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210719144913.076563739@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Layton [ Upstream commit 22d41cdcd3cfd467a4af074165357fcbea1c37f5 ] The checks for page->mapping are odd, as set_page_dirty is an address_space operation, and I don't see where it would be called on a non-pagecache page. The warning about the page lock also seems bogus. The comment over set_page_dirty() says that it can be called without the page lock in some rare cases. I don't think we want to warn if that's the case. Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ceph/addr.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c index fbf383048409..26de74684c17 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c @@ -72,10 +72,6 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) struct inode *inode; struct ceph_inode_info *ci; struct ceph_snap_context *snapc; - int ret; - - if (unlikely(!mapping)) - return !TestSetPageDirty(page); if (PageDirty(page)) { dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n", @@ -121,11 +117,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) page->private = (unsigned long)snapc; SetPagePrivate(page); - ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); - WARN_ON(!PageLocked(page)); - WARN_ON(!page->mapping); - - return ret; + return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); } /* -- 2.30.2