Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3780885pxv; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqEavGrn1Eta96LnP9ltIgUYwaOomKUY/7KyHNok8ZzJHi3OJs+H6JhQADNKEH3F+ajJnp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:270d:: with SMTP id y13mr35412899edd.66.1626708907791; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626708907; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n5B1c5jXanuAQzBk+mkuEW8HBBdHoW+v1TAdByoaGUqn/7cLWuRKngfOxK6mflK5CO YZBsQKyJHEPqeL2ZCvwkwySTu2KJL6v2OTbJZi0+QI7rQ2sifRrs5Qr1FmlffxeKRmYB DWGvybSHwWlNhR2oAz98j6Gqm97VSH73z2XrcWobHh3BFQqMUDeDgPtxjFcCdOsppwqU tiZxERUpKrpKuufwfAvr8I+XUTknzholyaYdNw733n8mPp8QUOOuxMtlHC32kCiaR5db o8ToS9ps00qS41ZrJ0Oa+s4UvgU/Z08/GzFb7AQo9MnDzt7l0tLWz+L9JOb9rl6ScUTe sLbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=g/Lnxb80qrzBU8zVbPmqgJXbR04VXU0ebtIZlJNC7ro=; b=D6tXLh0BfiS4HHS+Gbe8+ZaGef++aAUISppwUhfE0qzJKgvxwUXIGKO4zAhJWFpM8E imy5ZOkPYXE/EyaLPclwN10Hd7G4VnB3QpIRQGSxiSrhJZHZdLJzqrCP2ikHivjaWZ8t sDU7pl6mAqURAiHtIyNlIDbZAjTQH0Z0AqbEWPtkODICt9Zx7U4BkARDu8/nBg67UCbi BlTV3bd5jp91zuucdZI9MMuwoqXeipUbcULK4kFohN2zgI6mACZcJJFRoosHhXojY15w Qyz+IxdN2t7/0Kz5XFrb+ZpFp33lR5FtoE4QopF0++0+/gJCkcsPxCRtLkoaZFHchU8g EXbQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=yja4tB4v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12si22226987edu.48.2021.07.19.08.34.44; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=yja4tB4v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237934AbhGSOwX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:52:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47094 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S245549AbhGSOeo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:34:44 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC76461249; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:14:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626707655; bh=UI8arizcMZt0jWWuWkWK+1dPrCxJSzyeFbsb5TRcol0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yja4tB4vU4f4dvjsmwBz5mRr1HayyHZrhBPbqjzLCjtDh8dxjXSeUCA2FmWjn5I9I J1m7Im8c4cjsmTdZm6H5Yu0gE//2aXKni1L8tqFeCe91lyYSU89fIDHvX4h67wbLD2 lp3EdeW0pbXqK96HdFEcl+LlhGZkFc6pDvVG/zoE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , Ilya Dryomov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 217/245] ceph: remove bogus checks and WARN_ONs from ceph_set_page_dirty Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:52:39 +0200 Message-Id: <20210719144947.400686556@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210719144940.288257948@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210719144940.288257948@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Layton [ Upstream commit 22d41cdcd3cfd467a4af074165357fcbea1c37f5 ] The checks for page->mapping are odd, as set_page_dirty is an address_space operation, and I don't see where it would be called on a non-pagecache page. The warning about the page lock also seems bogus. The comment over set_page_dirty() says that it can be called without the page lock in some rare cases. I don't think we want to warn if that's the case. Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ceph/addr.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c index 36aa6d8cdff7..9791de2dc773 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c @@ -72,10 +72,6 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) struct inode *inode; struct ceph_inode_info *ci; struct ceph_snap_context *snapc; - int ret; - - if (unlikely(!mapping)) - return !TestSetPageDirty(page); if (PageDirty(page)) { dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n", @@ -121,11 +117,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) page->private = (unsigned long)snapc; SetPagePrivate(page); - ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); - WARN_ON(!PageLocked(page)); - WARN_ON(!page->mapping); - - return ret; + return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); } /* -- 2.30.2