Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@vt.edu>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, jianyong.wu@arm.com,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:16:24 -0400
Message-ID: <11790008.O9o76ZdvQC@iron-maiden>
Organization: Virginia Tech
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0LCZmHjwTjr6bWQ+uuO_3MentMfnHy2M_6iysyN9fP1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5729424.lOV4Wx5bFT@iron-maiden> <4331271.LvFx2qVVIh@iron-maiden> <CAK8P3a0LCZmHjwTjr6bWQ+uuO_3MentMfnHy2M_6iysyN9fP1g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 2:57:55 PM EDT Arnd Bergmann wrote: 
> This looks reasonable overall. I'm not sure if Thomas has other plans for
> this header, as he created the timekeeping.h one originally. There is also
> the potential for build regressions when additional files depend on
> timekeeping.h but don't include it directly. Hopefully the kbuild bot will
> warn us about any of those.
> 
>        Arnd

Your intuition was right Arnd. Playing with heavier configurations I have found 
three more files that also needed an update on the header. I am going to send 
the patch again (v2) including those. Please let me know if I should add your 
Reviewed-by or if you want me to do any further checking.

Thanks!

Carlos.