Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030411AbWKTXis (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:38:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966880AbWKTXis (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:38:48 -0500 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:52571 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966869AbWKTXir (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:38:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:35:28 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Stefan Richter , Patrick Caulfield , cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Teigland , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc5-mm2] fs/dlm: fix recursive dependency in Kconfig Message-Id: <20061120153528.5ace6089.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20061120174509.GW31879@stusta.de> References: <456179F6.1060501@redhat.com> <45619547.5070301@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20061120174509.GW31879@stusta.de> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1231 Lines: 26 On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:45:09 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 12:45:11PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > >... > > Anyway. Whatever you chose to do (or already have chosen to do) in > > fs/dlm/Kconfig, keep in mind that the "select" keyword is presently only > > poorly supported by the various .config generators and that it forces UI > > considerations into the Kconfig files which should better not be > > overloaded with UI issues. Or in other words: It is rather easy to write > > correct and well-supported Kconfig files if you stick with "depend on", > > but you get into trouble fast with generous usage of "select". > > For variables like NET or INET it doesn't matter in practice whether you > use "select" or "depends on". But for other variables it makes it really > hard for users to enable an option if you use "depends on". Doing a "select" NET or INET enables a ton of code, which IMO should be done explicitly, not covertly by a select. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/