Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3994059pxv; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:56:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaD8EM6AWT6NNkOZJxlSzwCre6O69L4OBb7K6FoeJOs/7qVp1vsr70+NnqD7iuilUWLkaN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4103:: with SMTP id j3mr28786693ejk.526.1626728206544; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:56:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626728206; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ss9fCg+zDhbVKjJnx4XxgaxK8S+oiN9RrO5RkVCn0+4K0Y2MLj5z3Vmbiw131FgL4M EUdlCz8Foq4FfCXUtsWf0L0Lwei9V6paI5i4uxUlPEp0Nj6uLqvEqUIage3Z2C5FwORV MMg0gjZXVckxVNxMoOpPjO94MNN7OXoYRljmdAyZxoQ3BrcDB/50N2d11ei9XB0/Q+d3 +XAfE10MBp1u+Ykk4quXV0cuRYby2Y48nn6bmtqXoCVfMaqkjUdtGHnH6DNz+Es64Rnu mj8J4hAErOTsrgGXqZz3l2dmQLQzv2oc1izLqdZEO5bycQj5QDeGr5xF9tgJUjzerQfG +FGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=r/EnTR5HRnLRPbtfmcrWf34QUCEOk8jn8W/r6abFvvg=; b=Wd9eLyC691vreW3q0PI/UbzcOozgvqq6U9jwcTlwg8cxo4JhCx+qVQSHJJtuFoTH++ ZOG+h/Sezv6VN6uHjtanZMmeKDK/3+TCOL6qKs3SbUgs9quTRPueOU0XhwapM/nK5v71 MUwtgcew+dEqAvBjnyoSKsLN2KDolf3SUiRa1UZuovEJ+FNhP6yWvOFLC2tKagPk6NrV Ydn5T9SOQVbIsIJ8UgJ3ClkBcD7CsXKLjwzdnNU7e5gzcwjT0v71Lc1FbQ9NGqr5hBcj zOKMxiXI6Mkm6efqUSu53EFoC1J0uNgrvLdL2SaM8cI9xLroDyCvtYnKqKp5Kz3qafCa AbAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ci3kpL9C; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dy9si23229765edb.114.2021.07.19.13.56.23; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ci3kpL9C; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1387361AbhGSUGU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:06:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50912 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1386534AbhGSTez (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:34:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCF5C0613A9 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id q10so17550125pfj.12 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:13:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r/EnTR5HRnLRPbtfmcrWf34QUCEOk8jn8W/r6abFvvg=; b=Ci3kpL9CZ6X85DeWmauzm5v8gjjaCLEZN36CGhMDHs3xJ1XgcgIVr1r10GUzNeok1u 3VOID1uAgVhMS8ZqHPnAsbO8+6eyv0+7DwTiK+vFJp2bfdDHPCOiv9oHGyS35/Xsllmj N7HnSARfQZcqzTFqUj4+6mSFyU/XGyTHkLI4q57WF29r38IawgIRHzyHhaARFyQ2d9yW N2HAEM+SVmc7JmTshyFQYOGyG7ir1hhM8bFiyPCSmLeMDb4G0e9SchZ4xRZaTEn+LbNg sjXTjzfjIP+m8cFGo5Z4VyTOADc3bNSFapplT4SotCIq6/ogCksebNf2sUcLSswRH0DO aoOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=r/EnTR5HRnLRPbtfmcrWf34QUCEOk8jn8W/r6abFvvg=; b=oppEstnB8CFTrBOKxK3RjBlGfKbXh9Vs14JH3oOxW6lDj9u9UReGlNm6ige+aBB/VX lOQ+YwF+BegRraRNwcfvgmPL5Y6N9Qg80wR7R1ZRVYWeeeoEyuj5XPCMzHyCTNFSh3J/ 5jOpxl/HhrEFS1EobOWj5X4yIQB2hjWu9g97fcNoopmwEO/BwHGvSJg5ulS92lSXBhWO kmvBzwVtpjmWX47BKPTwEhspNgwLX11YzjLgOZgbo6SrinzPyN/VPH55euyHYFfJo4Ui kfpDWN8kWcddp3ScMNkmRuXomPVVCBw5XtRSkoK83cm5LDYetf5eYTKvdtuVQmsd7tm1 sJlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ymHb2v/Kyl1Xtb5zZHV92lB4Z7N05JvHgU2d4EQZ73VvqR+rG yKMeIH6aP5ksDI3XoRICZj+sZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4e4d:: with SMTP id o13mr12139870pgl.300.1626725612500; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm24791033pgd.39.2021.07.19.13.13.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:13:28 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Brijesh Singh Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Tom Lendacky , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Sergio Lopez , Peter Gonda , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , David Rientjes , Dov Murik , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Borislav Petkov , Michael Roth , Vlastimil Babka , tony.luck@intel.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command Message-ID: References: <20210707183616.5620-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20210707183616.5620-27-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <9ee5a991-3e43-3489-5ee1-ff8c66cfabc1@amd.com> <379fd4da-3ca9-3205-535b-8d1891b3a75a@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 19, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > On 7/19/21 2:14 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > Where? I feel like I'm missing something. The only change to sev_free_vcpu() I > > see is that addition of the rmpupdate(), I don't see any reclaim path. > > Clearing of the immutable bit (aka reclaim) is done by the firmware after > the command was successful. Ah, which is why the failure path has to do manual reclaim of the immutable page. Thanks!