Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4159594pxv; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:50:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8ia4WFoRBJCRrscC5pBmqPO45GyMRe/Kee1OUkdopjsTsIWOmLl1IexWm0JD+9BEGF5Mp X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a072:: with SMTP id ia18mr5345185ejc.72.1626745807248; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:50:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626745807; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sHGHCNAz+9Sz9NA5Gw8Y0nCYEaMM9r7sZfTJSUfKiDLgUrJzBerrN63cTAfjxHsdCo 608jmiG6HjZI75SM7Zeea1tiE4lhc1uo/Q7Vzc03PnLLmpL18dqMo11qoSiTCUz3je/S KkBpa731nOzovfR9fsh4wn8T8syuyhPnNqlGIItQgLThWjI0/I4tS+h2tny2MODGX6f+ kDSMZz8XXyi9jToxit5fHbHrl6gYkxje5upClUs7hUL3qU1+SO0TL8w26+woz08jBv0O 2scgzqaqPBB1+Irj781NZpN2KYbaKFPGhan1N5tDo2hnrHMndTProPFv+nzeKDV4uxPZ KU/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=30ALGzE4LUzMEDcJZb9zkSfYaaWYubrmybpQgwpXlNk=; b=qezagqGPiDhgamilwPBDhfHMPVYV6zcziJhaph38ZsE5Rg5EiejtiOG3XH4QGHsE9d VfUCoHvafHMHWd8VF1LDpeiRfaZSaRzd1QkSJOyuzUARmHmyozGc2kuWJI/llWi0cR5C spknK8XTGU2XTA5cr2drjYrZGjGftiZiBaDO8xFZcVm/bb5q/TEz1YqFE8neNPGLcMT8 AE0WF8dn1f3KKeinHEpv4W70FeC6qOhK3qFkfuG2QTwg26NSsh/XKHnPgvSX1udjgPAE YGhv8VwTBgchZjIGlhJaracwPovYCIN0hBSRgHx0nBUb48KqtunyoRUDpw8Czuwx4Ot/ veiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=HNBjq3o3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16si21213056eju.12.2021.07.19.18.49.45; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=HNBjq3o3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245241AbhGSPLG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:11:06 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40860 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343990AbhGSOsh (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:48:37 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38828613D3; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 15:25:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1626708351; bh=29/d8iHVTKTqMfAj+ImN5vbWDiKq9zh5EN7smpYH6Ys=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HNBjq3o3tKi8E6PWOVkI71iwR6n7SSzxHeeXLNeXFSjwnguwyN5CqQyNLIZZJNxun Uq8RL0UBvUnH9lQw7QkVi8p55BnA47G3F5+K+ggNHqlWGKcwk5CuAqfAV1/I8iUYew zRfU1h0JfM3N0SmQvz41GwI4TqPE3yLPlANcrOqw= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , Ilya Dryomov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 277/315] ceph: remove bogus checks and WARN_ONs from ceph_set_page_dirty Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:52:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20210719144952.528325480@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210719144942.861561397@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210719144942.861561397@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeff Layton [ Upstream commit 22d41cdcd3cfd467a4af074165357fcbea1c37f5 ] The checks for page->mapping are odd, as set_page_dirty is an address_space operation, and I don't see where it would be called on a non-pagecache page. The warning about the page lock also seems bogus. The comment over set_page_dirty() says that it can be called without the page lock in some rare cases. I don't think we want to warn if that's the case. Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/ceph/addr.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c index ae1435c12d2b..1dba2b95fe8e 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c @@ -74,10 +74,6 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) struct inode *inode; struct ceph_inode_info *ci; struct ceph_snap_context *snapc; - int ret; - - if (unlikely(!mapping)) - return !TestSetPageDirty(page); if (PageDirty(page)) { dout("%p set_page_dirty %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n", @@ -123,11 +119,7 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) page->private = (unsigned long)snapc; SetPagePrivate(page); - ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); - WARN_ON(!PageLocked(page)); - WARN_ON(!page->mapping); - - return ret; + return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page); } /* -- 2.30.2