Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] firmware: tee_bnxt: Release TEE shm, session, and
 context during kexec
To:     Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
        Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc:     Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@microsoft.com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
        OP-TEE TrustedFirmware <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210716022332.GC3232@sequoia>
 <CAHLZf_t5U1bh1H8sULbJz7xrZ-r3Dcmxuw9MMmG2fehS3C72uQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHUa44EetPuA_5+UQLW-c=-_OApiRoiq+YjeFs6TRPj6=AJfHw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <903824a6-7a2b-1514-5b71-a2db634e9abf@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:32:01 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44EetPuA_5+UQLW-c=-_OApiRoiq+YjeFs6TRPj6=AJfHw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 7/19/2021 3:49 AM, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 4:48 AM Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Allen/Tyler,
>>   The patch looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Rafal, is it OK if I include this patch together with the rest of the
> patches in this patch set in a pull request to arm-soc?

I can take those patches through the Broadcom ARM SoC pull request, 
Rafal would that work for you? We seem to have a bit of a maintainer 
coverage blind spot for that directory.
-- 
Florian