Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4333993pxv; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDRZEemg8bFHBbGfpNYjDlLOPs3uwPgEEhNFYY0CjCRSpWX5ncarI28lxsXtIk97HXw/3m X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:95cb:: with SMTP id n11mr30776533ejy.429.1626767552206; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:52:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626767552; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xXJThUUre/1g5fzN1lr3xh2qfOhBJoSUJwjtn9Ep0K+OI+gjSpwetxiybvK+n5hRys pzIy4aOQqLLfmdteDou9yEOnwt3Tys96sLZhLaMXyGKoc7OZeZcC8TZ4lMpPWaewDpTN rH/quRypBXY9BYvDBLIgrKKKrxtd0l8IXGChiMN9lsuXn67QgDnWZNbH6wDQgJPf0vpz PE0JLMjUhH4ef3tdbdF1goO//ZtlxG4PrgvNLNm/KDj1k2hqlvoraSX2m6UuiEZbIyxU 3BI/OdQPhHvbRHJED4KafdvCxFo7CoD2HzSK1k9m35yTqv380o8InqXBEyf7Dp7Tn8zz kYqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=RLexACuX95MDYDo40gYB8ItSZTvydLu0kjY+4b/mrIo=; b=P8PlOQXbv8m4EjXKPRb/X+YJBb9fTyGx2fUo5yozmOIBaSC8mcImHsqeq1KHoXE35w vqVMZzJNLGM2LT7eoJz6xtAUzpvvwugM2XVnitGaYu2+lvhPhBqgLTQchGaS7zGy3cPK ToojGGedhPhVHWaO2K8uAXMyeDZRq1P0PHtZgmMma3ssOrZ6xRO6KQy92MNPjm+pgTug rsDtwb3iAXWTDvYr/qgj8rjll5nDR0OnCXou4iw7/rMTFerqtn/UswyqQLUMFglF+Rmr 32CldWlYsg8Cetk1Ep+BRiid0e3sAs1yBLkqZyCmIRYlyab1rDaNkzLSnCiPvgUcTgV9 +czg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z9si24596039edd.553.2021.07.20.00.52.08; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229872AbhGTHJu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 03:09:50 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:7403 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230135AbhGTHJd (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 03:09:33 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GTW4R2pSrz7xBj; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:46:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm000001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.245) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:50:09 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.113.32) by dggpemm000001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.245) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:50:08 +0800 From: Nanyong Sun To: , , , , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v4.19.y,v5.4.y] mm: slab: fix kmem_cache_create failed when sysfs node not destroyed Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:20:48 +0800 Message-ID: <20210720082048.2797315-1-sunnanyong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0.huawei.25 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.32] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm000001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.245) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The commit d38a2b7a9c93 ("mm: memcg/slab: fix memory leak at non-root kmem_cache destroy") introduced a problem: If one thread destroy a kmem_cache A and another thread concurrently create a kmem_cache B, which is mergeable with A and has same size with A, the B may fail to create due to the duplicate sysfs node. The scenario in detail: 1) Thread 1 uses kmem_cache_destroy() to destroy kmem_cache A which is mergeable, it decreases A's refcount and if refcount is 0, then call memcg_set_kmem_cache_dying() which set A->memcg_params.dying = true, then unlock the slab_mutex and call flush_memcg_workqueue(), it may cost a while. Note: now the sysfs node(like '/kernel/slab/:0000248') of A is still present, it will be deleted in shutdown_cache() which will be called after flush_memcg_workqueue() is done and lock the slab_mutex again. 2) Now if thread 2 is coming, it use kmem_cache_create() to create B, which is mergeable with A(their size is same), it gain the lock of slab_mutex, then call __kmem_cache_alias() trying to find a mergeable node, because of the below added code in commit d38a2b7a9c93 ("mm: memcg/slab: fix memory leak at non-root kmem_cache destroy"), B is not mergeable with A whose memcg_params.dying is true. int slab_unmergeable(struct kmem_cache *s) if (s->refcount < 0) return 1; /* * Skip the dying kmem_cache. */ if (s->memcg_params.dying) return 1; return 0; } So B has to create its own sysfs node by calling: create_cache-> __kmem_cache_create-> sysfs_slab_add-> kobject_init_and_add Because B is mergeable itself, its filename of sysfs node is based on its size, like '/kernel/slab/:0000248', which is duplicate with A, and the sysfs node of A is still present now, so kobject_init_and_add() will return fail and result in kmem_cache_create() fail. Concurrently modprobe and rmmod the two modules below can reproduce the issue quickly: nf_conntrack_expect, se_sess_cache. See call trace in the end. LTS versions of v4.19.y and v5.4.y have this problem, whereas linux versions after v5.9 do not have this problem because the patchset: ("The new cgroup slab memory controller") almost refactored memcg slab. A potential solution(this patch belongs): Just let the dying kmem_cache be mergeable, the slab_mutex lock can prevent the race between alias kmem_cache creating thread and root kmem_cache destroying thread. In the destroying thread, after flush_memcg_workqueue() is done, judge the refcount again, if someone reference it again during un-lock time, we don't need to destroy the kmem_cache completely, we can reuse it. Another potential solution: revert the commit d38a2b7a9c93 ("mm: memcg/slab: fix memory leak at non-root kmem_cache destroy"), compare to the fail of kmem_cache_create, the memory leak in special scenario seems less harmful. Call trace: sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/kernel/slab/:0000248' Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198 show_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack+0xb0/0x100 sysfs_warn_dup+0x6c/0x88 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x104/0x120 kobject_add_internal+0xd0/0x378 kobject_init_and_add+0x90/0xd8 sysfs_slab_add+0x16c/0x2d0 __kmem_cache_create+0x16c/0x1d8 create_cache+0xbc/0x1f8 kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x1a0/0x230 kmem_cache_create+0x50/0x68 init_se_kmem_caches+0x38/0x258 [target_core_mod] target_core_init_configfs+0x8c/0x390 [target_core_mod] do_one_initcall+0x54/0x230 do_init_module+0x64/0x1ec load_module+0x150c/0x16f0 __se_sys_finit_module+0xf0/0x108 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x24/0x30 el0_svc_common+0x80/0x1c0 el0_svc_handler+0x78/0xe0 el0_svc+0x10/0x260 kobject_add_internal failed for :0000248 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory. kmem_cache_create(se_sess_cache) failed with error -17 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x198 show_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack+0xb0/0x100 kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0xa8/0x230 kmem_cache_create+0x50/0x68 init_se_kmem_caches+0x38/0x258 [target_core_mod] target_core_init_configfs+0x8c/0x390 [target_core_mod] do_one_initcall+0x54/0x230 do_init_module+0x64/0x1ec load_module+0x150c/0x16f0 __se_sys_finit_module+0xf0/0x108 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x24/0x30 el0_svc_common+0x80/0x1c0 el0_svc_handler+0x78/0xe0 el0_svc+0x10/0x260 Fixes: d38a2b7a9c93 ("mm: memcg/slab: fix memory leak at non-root kmem_cache destroy") Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- mm/slab_common.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index d208b47e01a8..acc743315bb5 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -326,14 +326,6 @@ int slab_unmergeable(struct kmem_cache *s) if (s->refcount < 0) return 1; -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM - /* - * Skip the dying kmem_cache. - */ - if (s->memcg_params.dying) - return 1; -#endif - return 0; } @@ -947,6 +939,16 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) get_online_mems(); mutex_lock(&slab_mutex); + + /* + *Another thread referenced it again + */ + if (READ_ONCE(s->refcount)) { + spin_lock_irq(&memcg_kmem_wq_lock); + s->memcg_params.dying = false; + spin_unlock_irq(&memcg_kmem_wq_lock); + goto out_unlock; + } #endif err = shutdown_memcg_caches(s); -- 2.18.0.huawei.25