Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4973048pxv; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhY/k3HPE9RV96q1JcueTPTt4LbNXVhZl862f286ziM2j1Mu2PqAJyxWgnUoPhZBd2nyus X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5d0b:: with SMTP id g11mr35783494ejt.437.1626822020159; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626822020; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s1PjF9Zx5B1S8flpvr44qCXoO8jGNLOgwtnpM7oVzQUzigPI7P40pmrtOcBXk1RR2/ SO2An5GgrDk2SzYr/6fNq16z8/DBhneWOnVzcZjPLur2xHJfFAp96QLakL1KGc6Z5ppy /fuMrbc0X1AQVo13bowbM6u/agwv7Lmx30QfjL6Zwjdx9kJ4IZwfcA2zOUqD7PuGN/CA tJfqJkNT35AOhiREHxIQmBz9xdNyywlFSm9b/NmKHxxaHwoCT+y5j4bpzFG2PYxPDMfP d+oY2GeYtNCZwdUeCxF5obpMPXA0/R6bsecuWOml4Un0EcBF+zbF5VzYy54r64UVrHrT u4sA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=HVwZnReiAAGm6kayHzY9xB2V3lYV+KAbyCBj9EJlnY8=; b=oGAkugghbgrAbettnYWWZy3G2KZapXDQKVDLNcuPagfhmsP7IlT2BS4fz8dDeWPMvk 3f+D7JA0z4e0q56/ZrRAnLqf5HXNJG4XN9ntw0B9OKQWMQ2XJ4057v1lwITF/0Glr9sb Ksf1N9g4QZgeLLLtuAusZsLJKJIekw052EBY1HVO+txdXylbnE6ycNgvI5+sUdUwaVmO wNaaIabLqXy8/qC5PNewXiucVLdrnem+AmfWyciwPYhVMcG606HWwLM4ZxFH8fx8h0eJ J234mqXXAIqteuUF6vvtpfMSLXIGBvUMfJ34jcVHFvBuc3q6gv+iGm7K+5qmdLCNAVbb qsyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=toshiba.co.jp Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jt22si19412857ejc.635.2021.07.20.15.59.55; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=toshiba.co.jp Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231650AbhGTWQG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:16:06 -0400 Received: from mo-csw1116.securemx.jp ([210.130.202.158]:50812 "EHLO mo-csw.securemx.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229909AbhGTWQE (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:16:04 -0400 Received: by mo-csw.securemx.jp (mx-mo-csw1116) id 16KMuCkV014291; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:56:12 +0900 X-Iguazu-Qid: 2wHHhCFIH53oZqJTkY X-Iguazu-QSIG: v=2; s=0; t=1626821771; q=2wHHhCFIH53oZqJTkY; m=osn/bC0N2WaDy/AzOTDVXyRnjqCX4pb+KOZFZw4KUVo= Received: from imx2-a.toshiba.co.jp (imx2-a.toshiba.co.jp [106.186.93.35]) by relay.securemx.jp (mx-mr1110) id 16KMu9IV030713 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:56:10 +0900 Received: from enc01.toshiba.co.jp (enc01.toshiba.co.jp [106.186.93.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imx2-a.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB161000FF; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:56:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from hop001.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.164.63]) by enc01.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id 16KMu9gm026090; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:56:09 +0900 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:56:08 +0900 From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu To: Rob Herring Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , PCI , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Punit Agrawal , yuji2.ishikawa@toshiba.co.jp, linux-arm-kernel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] PCI: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti PCIe host controller driver X-TSB-HOP: ON Message-ID: <20210720225608.yt6ymgw3m7ol4erq@toshiba.co.jp> References: <20210629234952.306578-1-nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> <20210629234952.306578-3-nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thanks for your review. On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:43:49AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 5:50 PM Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > wrote: > > > > Add support to PCIe RC controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs. PCIe > > controller is based of Synopsys DesignWare PCIe core. > > > > This patch does not yet use the clock framework to control the clock. > > This will be replaced in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 9 + > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c | 360 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 370 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > > index 423d35872ce4..7c3dcb86fcad 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig > > @@ -286,6 +286,15 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194_EP > > in order to enable device-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_EP must be > > selected. This uses the DesignWare core. > > > > +config PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST > > + bool "Toshiba Visconti PCIe controllers" > > + depends on ARCH_VISCONTI || COMPILE_TEST > > + depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN > > + select PCIE_DW_HOST > > + help > > + Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on Toshiba Visconti SoC. > > + This driver supports TMPV7708 SoC. > > + > > config PCIE_UNIPHIER > > bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe host controllers" > > depends on ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > > index eca805c1a023..0b569d54deb3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_VISCONTI_HOST) += pcie-visconti.o > > > > # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI > > # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access. > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..1e1caa2ba1b6 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,360 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * DWC PCIe RC driver for Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Toshiba Electronic Device & Storage Corporation > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 TOSHIBA CORPORATION > > + * > > + * Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > + */ > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#include "pcie-designware.h" > > +#include "../../pci.h" > > + > > +struct visconti_pcie { > > + struct dw_pcie pci; > > + void __iomem *ulreg_base; > > + void __iomem *smu_base; > > + void __iomem *mpu_base; > > + struct clk *refclk; > > + struct clk *coreclk; > > + struct clk *auxclk; > > +}; > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE 0x00F4 > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_EP 0x00 > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC 0x04 > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL 0x00F8 > > +#define PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN BIT(3) > > +#define PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN BIT(2) > > +#define PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT BIT(1) > > +#define PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN BIT(0) > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL_INIT (PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN | \ > > + PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN | \ > > + PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02 0x0104 > > +#define PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03 0x0108 > > +#define PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1 0x0138 > > +#define PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT BIT(0) > > +#define PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT BIT(1) > > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0 BIT(2) > > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1 BIT(3) > > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2 BIT(4) > > +#define PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3 BIT(5) > > +#define PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL (PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT | \ > > + PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT | \ > > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0 | \ > > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1 | \ > > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2 | \ > > + PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SB_MON 0x0198 > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON 0x019C > > +#define PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_DBG_00 0x0844 > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01 0x0860 > > +#define PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00 0x0864 > > +#define PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02 0x0868 > > +#define PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT 0x01 > > +#define PCIE_UL_S_L0 0x11 > > + > > +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE 0x0038 > > +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK BIT(1) > > +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE 0x0538 > > +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N BIT(1) > > +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN 0x0 > > +#define MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE BIT(0) > > + > > +#define PCIE_BUS_OFFSET 0x40000000 > > + > > +/* Access registers in PCIe ulreg */ > > +static void visconti_ulreg_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg) > > +{ > > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->ulreg_base + reg); > > +} > > + > > +static u32 visconti_ulreg_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg) > > +{ > > + return readl_relaxed(pcie->ulreg_base + reg); > > +} > > + > > +/* Access registers in PCIe smu */ > > +static void visconti_smu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg) > > +{ > > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->smu_base + reg); > > +} > > + > > +/* Access registers in PCIe mpu */ > > +static void visconti_mpu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg) > > +{ > > + writel_relaxed(val, pcie->mpu_base + reg); > > +} > > + > > +static u32 visconti_mpu_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg) > > +{ > > + return readl_relaxed(pcie->mpu_base + reg); > > +} > > + > > +static int visconti_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > +{ > > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev); > > + void __iomem *addr = pcie->ulreg_base; > > + int ret; > > + u32 val; > > + > > + /* wait for linkup of phy link layer */ > > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00, > > + val, (val & PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP), > > + 90000, 100000); > > This function is really supposed to be 'is the link up or not', not > 'wait for link up' as that is what the caller does. Isn't link up just > all 3 register bits are set? And it is possible for the 3rd bit > (PCIE_UL_S_L0) to be set without the first 2 bits set? IOW, can't you > just check PCIE_UL_S_L0? I mistook in using this function. As you wrote, there is no problem in checking PCIE_UL_S_L0. I will fix it. > > > + if (ret) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* wait for linkup of data link layer */ > > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02, > > + val, (val & PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT), > > + 90000, 100000); > > + if (ret) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* wait for LTSSM Status */ > > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02, > > + val, (val & PCIE_UL_S_L0), > > + 90000, 100000); > > + if (ret) > > + return 0; > > + return 1; > > +} > > + > > +static int visconti_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > +{ > > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev); > > + > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE, > > + PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01); > > + > > + if (dw_pcie_link_up(pci)) { > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN); > > + visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val & ~MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE, > > + PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN); > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL, > > + PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1); > > Do these really have to be set after link up? Indeed, I can move this before dw_pcie_link_up(). I will fix this. > > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void visconti_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > +{ > > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = visconti_ulreg_readl(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01); > > + val &= ~PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE; > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01); > > + > > + val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN); > > + visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val | MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN); > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * In this SoC specification, the CPU bus outputs the offset value from > > + * 0x40000000 to the PCIE bus, so 0x40000000 is subtracted from the CPU > > + * bus address. This 0x40000000 is also based on io_base from DT. > > + */ > > +static u64 visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup(struct dw_pcie *pci, u64 cpu_addr) > > +{ > > + struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; > > + > > + return cpu_addr & ~pp->io_base; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { > > + .cpu_addr_fixup = visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup, > > + .link_up = visconti_pcie_link_up, > > + .start_link = visconti_pcie_start_link, > > + .stop_link = visconti_pcie_stop_link, > > +}; > > + > > +static int visconti_pcie_power_on(struct visconti_pcie *pcie) > > +{ > > + void __iomem *addr; > > + int err; > > + u32 val; > > + > > + visconti_smu_writel(pcie, > > + PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK | PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK, > > + PISMU_CKON_PCIE); > > + ndelay(250); > > + > > + visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N, > > + PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE); > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC, > > + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE); > > + > > + val = PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL_INIT; > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL); > > + udelay(100); > > + > > + val |= PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT; > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL); > > + udelay(100); > > + > > + visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N, > > + PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE); > > + > > + addr = pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03; > > + err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr, val, > > + (val & PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE), > > + 100, 1000); > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + > > + visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE, > > + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02); > > + > > + addr = pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON; > > + return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(addr, val, > > + (val & PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON), 100, > > + 1000); > > +} > > + > > +static int visconti_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) > > +{ > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); > > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev); > > + > > + return visconti_pcie_power_on(pcie); > > This function doesn't do anything but call visconti_pcie_power_on(). > Just collapse to 1 function. > OK, I will move the contents of visconti_pcie_power_on to visconti_pcie_host_init. > > +} > > + > > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops visconti_pcie_host_ops = { > > + .host_init = visconti_pcie_host_init, > > +}; > > + > > +static int visconti_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev, > > + struct visconti_pcie *pcie) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > + > > + pcie->ulreg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ulreg"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base)) > > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base); > > + > > + pcie->smu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "smu"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->smu_base)) > > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->smu_base); > > + > > + pcie->mpu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mpu"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->mpu_base)) > > + return PTR_ERR(pcie->mpu_base); > > + > > + pcie->refclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->refclk)) > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->refclk), > > + "Failed to get ref clock\n"); > > + > > + pcie->coreclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->coreclk)) > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->coreclk), > > + "Failed to get core clock\n"); > > + > > + pcie->auxclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "aux"); > > + if (IS_ERR(pcie->auxclk)) > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie->auxclk), > > + "Failed to get aux clock\n"); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int > > +visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci; > > + struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > + > > + pp->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "intr"); > > + if (pp->irq < 0) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Interrupt intr is missing"); > > + return pp->irq; > > + } > > + > > + pp->ops = &visconti_pcie_host_ops; > > + > > + pci->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(pdev->dev.of_node); > > The common DWC code reads this for you now. You only need to set it to > default. See other drivers for examples. I don't need this code by using DT. Remove these codes. Best regards, Nobuhiro