Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5163678pxv; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:50:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEHlV2j3f8gIJeL/p9kAfWuDBZOgOVYdYvvDGN7WLazS3xNsAFsLkuFbyIZgVr+yYJIOHp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3a4:: with SMTP id z4mr29316298jap.65.1626843035195; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:50:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626843035; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pOei8LXzHau34ZMtQw79qbHA7d6qnge7XVyQtN3iwPAd1ONb7RXvLOlmPkVR68vFbA LksGf3cYrITgyP/xu5jY7zZKiJjekpzCDVj/5sX7PyYCIHCSKQU7CGYxlHKEPibbusy2 Jd0Dn+U0xy3YUh2wrsJngWtlqktApS/Db0hseojL6IiQYzZGo84htWlLGK7RHVTVNL7u idAr4CN1M6lLrN6135H8ZCUVcAjMRm9cygNKZUH4GJm2h0rfAy4w8y78hHX+U+GbnVIf bdv3Vq6uAFUcb4CiUGKUwynOC2TKpykq3pokGslxM7V4TBdYZwJ0LSepaA922af88rB7 AeHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=M/VM3WT9XDfsRCRw/bDg34mxW8T9kPGyUJ+1apZTpFs=; b=UFdrwOUHmHAS/xzio2CnYkoRWIlAg1QRwEbNMXC/nHEf6qEtDUdlqyL7Bodhltguei 9oV5LmBoYWqSxm5f/ZpZDlhV5RpALEfCE4XGYaxq1F261F9Ltj/0xXoXw+ZGUm2Wc+PC BKODfIe7P/6Hxz2juQpf79hVUoCRx5Y5h+XLKVEqBs+qnc5KStf+giPwXY2cYueaCdiz R0iMdBFDEtEQugF6quE+R8zacHKXYhX813kJs4P1gvB59L+Kgh2R4Nh4X9PvnRplps5z S7AD8TSfUB12iQPkBYOUdxuLETgWibmBw0mvW/TmSHiLzV1LqzgRQ/V5ifimJHvmM//s /+QQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k2si25352176jao.12.2021.07.20.21.50.24; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231958AbhGUEJA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:09:00 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44934 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232549AbhGUEIm (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:08:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCFC1FB; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.64.235] (unknown [10.163.64.235]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 098023F66F; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: Introduce struct pgtable_debug_args To: Gavin Shan , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, chuhu@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com References: <20210719054138.198373-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20210719054138.198373-2-gshan@redhat.com> <8d754894-5c21-1287-82b6-7ac3b064af3d@redhat.com> <1d8c1b0f-3102-5a4a-f3fb-a0fc50d281cc@redhat.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:20:04 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1d8c1b0f-3102-5a4a-f3fb-a0fc50d281cc@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/21/21 4:59 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: > On 7/20/21 4:42 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 7/19/21 6:31 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>> +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && >>>> +        has_transparent_hugepage()) { >>>> +        page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER); >>>> +        if (page) { >>>> +            args->pmd_pfn = page_to_pfn(page); >>>> +            args->pte_pfn = args->pmd_pfn; >>>> +            return 0; >>>> +        } >>>> +    } >>>> + >>> >>> As syzbot reported against v1 series, we could allocate pages larger than (1 << (MAX_ORDER - 1)) here. >>> So __GFP_NOWARN is needed here. I will fix it in v3 series. >> >> I could find the following build error reported from lkp on V2. >> >> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c:445:8: warning: variable 'pud' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] >> > > Yes, The following line is missed in PATCH[v2 09/12] and fixed in > PATCH[v3 09/12]: WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud)). With this line added, > the variable @pud is used in v3. > >> Could you please point to the syzbot reported problem on V1 as you >> have mentioned above. Are there configs where HPAGE_[PMD|PUD]_ORDER >> is greater than (MAX_ORDER - 1) ? If yes, how adding __GFP_NOWARN >> solves the problem ? >> > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8730ec44a441a434a2c8 > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=29a82c885e192046 > > The kernel config has the following options: > > CONFIG_X86_64=y > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y > CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD=y > #define PUD_SHIFT        30 > #define PMD_SHIFT        21 > > CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER=n > #define MAX_ORDER    11 > > (HPAGE_PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) >= (1 << MAX_ORDER) > (HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)              <  (1 << MAX_ORDER) > > The warning is triggered in the following path, __GFP_NOWARN helps to > avoid the WARNING_ON_ONCE(), but NULL is returned as expected. > >    alloc_pages >      __alloc_pages > >        if (unlikely(order >= MAX_ORDER)) { >                 WARN_ON_ONCE(!(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN)); >                 return NULL; >         } But then that does not allocate the PUD element for the test which subsequently will be skipped. Isn't it ? So if the order is greater than MAX_ORDER, allocation needs to happen via alloc_contig_pages() or something similar.