Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5165498pxv; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzV9kz+nQHwwyTyk08rGdNnabHNrGgmEm/4K6O0gUH7g4MuL02FTSGPhS1phriPmIm++hQc X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c804:: with SMTP id a4mr45904592edt.294.1626843265011; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:54:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626843265; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DeznHn8ajMlRwmGlcrnxMfO+NOt3DTBpgwNfw02nC+ICVCeORwYXqSuqHAsrMdhE69 1dCKjMIJ7j+gTIjY5MN4Txl96v3qZbwvrPRz6BOGfy334B2XmhZffLpss7EfxaqW0OrH N3QIGXDMy0Sf/tLgt/DuPd/g1juX2UMk3CbV6fHN01+NElGF8qaDwniHrPpnueXzS3DJ Zk166tMTkh2/fMLm5g3ufv38v7Us2Yep9/iAZ1O+oR5q9pys3KzdS+G56VcvmUFrt80c s8M/ck4d4xTv6QycarNaYrzvdhz48pILR5tRUepjKRQMSjTfgqkkdwWibIACfeflFZsa zg9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :sender:dkim-signature; bh=ysfU1fmJUQ+goJDisL4cBXfJ715oyfGSSo4Tjw8BxEE=; b=k88AHulL34QyL6Zq5LeNd9RWWwTdQw+Fo6MbVYJ1KUMv20F5wIWzWG9mcs/khDy99x gjFVoQha8PCzhLqtyTLvzNW2UBh4Jsog/DPfkjAxgpolS+sK7fEAl7MkdCkpy778sX5+ a91jgotdWfA1LVjbDjRTpcfr5yFbUwmgqmDhmHZKg5Y406tVnR28fFPuuUJTjX9nytd+ w03se9Ydhpr3GqVvI5DUpLYVEaf8OdUAK/PPFHNkkrU6Wgmh15DN/MBa9BjSRvEIZg0C I7hMzlyWsHLspChyZOzRmfcJIN9uXRDnzuR7IrI0hJTtsTs+y1dzoYPdiRen303M9ARx wmLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=qn5c4RzU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w5si2618305edd.90.2021.07.20.21.54.01; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 21:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=qn5c4RzU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232187AbhGUELY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:11:24 -0400 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.9]:64916 "EHLO so254-9.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232579AbhGUEIp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:08:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1626842962; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=ysfU1fmJUQ+goJDisL4cBXfJ715oyfGSSo4Tjw8BxEE=; b=qn5c4RzUfW5mQUibPJXOtZQs0DB47tEwYBFWAhM/7WUaLj1ZaRPwAFj5APzgyKyLOv4AItP8 v1BxEjdHbM4jqfzprrk/f+kOO8GQWzg6EQS6Z/PG5W92tYJH7P+aeN839B5JanpHC0anerZM HULhJ8WQ29TPsgwgBTXRkVvYBxg= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n03.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 60f7a73afcf9fe7b782c5dd4 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:48:58 GMT Sender: saiprakash.ranjan=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A1783C43143; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:48:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: saiprakash.ranjan) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0DCEC433F1; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 04:48:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:18:56 +0530 From: Sai Prakash Ranjan To: Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson , Krishna Reddy , Thierry Reding , Tomasz Figa , Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] iommu/arm-smmu: Optimize ->tlb_flush_walk() for qcom implementation In-Reply-To: References: <20210623134201.16140-1-saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Robin, Will, On 2021-07-12 09:39, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > Hi Robin, > > On 2021-06-23 19:12, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: >> Currently for iommu_unmap() of large scatter-gather list with page >> size >> elements, the majority of time is spent in flushing of partial walks >> in >> __arm_lpae_unmap() which is a VA based TLB invalidation invalidating >> page-by-page on iommus like arm-smmu-v2 (TLBIVA). >> >> For example: to unmap a 32MB scatter-gather list with page size >> elements >> (8192 entries), there are 16->2MB buffer unmaps based on the pgsize >> (2MB >> for 4K granule) and each of 2MB will further result in 512 TLBIVAs >> (2MB/4K) >> resulting in a total of 8192 TLBIVAs (512*16) for 16->2MB causing a >> huge >> overhead. >> >> On qcom implementation, there are several performance improvements for >> TLB cache invalidations in HW like wait-for-safe (for realtime clients >> such as camera and display) and few others to allow for cache >> lookups/updates when TLBI is in progress for the same context bank. >> So the cost of over-invalidation is less compared to the unmap latency >> on several usecases like camera which deals with large buffers. So, >> ASID based TLB invalidations (TLBIASID) can be used to invalidate the >> entire context for partial walk flush thereby improving the unmap >> latency. >> >> Non-strict mode can use this by default for all platforms given its >> all about over-invalidation saving time on individual unmaps and >> non-deterministic generally. >> >> For this example of 32MB scatter-gather list unmap, this change >> results >> in just 16 ASID based TLB invalidations (TLBIASIDs) as opposed to 8192 >> TLBIVAs thereby increasing the performance of unmaps drastically. >> >> Test on QTI SM8150 SoC for 10 iterations of iommu_{map_sg}/unmap: >> (average over 10 iterations) >> >> Before this optimization: >> >> size iommu_map_sg iommu_unmap >> 4K 2.067 us 1.854 us >> 64K 9.598 us 8.802 us >> 1M 148.890 us 130.718 us >> 2M 305.864 us 67.291 us >> 12M 1793.604 us 390.838 us >> 16M 2386.848 us 518.187 us >> 24M 3563.296 us 775.989 us >> 32M 4747.171 us 1033.364 us >> >> After this optimization: >> >> size iommu_map_sg iommu_unmap >> 4K 1.723 us 1.765 us >> 64K 9.880 us 8.869 us >> 1M 155.364 us 135.223 us >> 2M 303.906 us 5.385 us >> 12M 1786.557 us 21.250 us >> 16M 2391.890 us 27.437 us >> 24M 3570.895 us 39.937 us >> 32M 4755.234 us 51.797 us >> >> This is further reduced once the map/unmap_pages() support gets in >> which >> will result in just 1 TLBIASID as compared to 16 TLBIASIDs. >> >> Real world data also shows big difference in unmap performance as >> below: >> >> There were reports of camera frame drops because of high overhead in >> iommu unmap without this optimization because of frequent unmaps >> issued >> by camera of about 100MB/s taking more than 100ms thereby causing >> frame >> drops. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan >> --- >> >> Changes in v3: >> * Move the logic to arm-smmu driver from io-pgtable (Robin) >> * Use a new set of iommu_flush_ops->arm_smmu_s1_tlb_impl_ops and use >> it for qcom impl >> >> Changes in v2: >> * Add a quirk to choose tlb_flush_all in partial walk flush >> * Set the quirk for QTI SoC implementation >> >> --- >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c >> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c >> index 7771d40176de..218c71465819 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c >> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ >> >> #include "arm-smmu.h" >> >> +extern const struct iommu_flush_ops arm_smmu_s1_tlb_impl_ops; >> + >> struct qcom_smmu { >> struct arm_smmu_device smmu; >> bool bypass_quirk; >> @@ -146,6 +148,8 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct >> arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, >> { >> struct adreno_smmu_priv *priv; >> >> + pgtbl_cfg->tlb = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_impl_ops; >> + >> /* Only enable split pagetables for the GPU device (SID 0) */ >> if (!qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(dev)) >> return 0; >> @@ -185,6 +189,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id >> qcom_smmu_client_of_match[] __maybe_unused = { >> { } >> }; >> >> +static int qcom_smmu_init_context(struct arm_smmu_domain >> *smmu_domain, >> + struct io_pgtable_cfg *pgtbl_cfg, struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + pgtbl_cfg->tlb = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_impl_ops; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> static int qcom_smmu_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> { >> unsigned int last_s2cr = ARM_SMMU_GR0_S2CR(smmu->num_mapping_groups >> - 1); >> @@ -308,6 +320,7 @@ static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct >> arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> } >> >> static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_impl = { >> + .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context, >> .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe, >> .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type, >> .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset, >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c >> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c >> index d3c6f54110a5..f3845e822565 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c >> @@ -341,6 +341,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_add_page_s1(struct >> iommu_iotlb_gather *gather, >> ARM_SMMU_CB_S1_TLBIVAL); >> } >> >> +static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk_impl_s1(unsigned long iova, size_t >> size, >> + size_t granule, void *cookie) >> +{ >> + arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context_s1(cookie); >> +} >> + >> static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk_s2(unsigned long iova, size_t size, >> size_t granule, void *cookie) >> { >> @@ -388,6 +394,12 @@ static const struct iommu_flush_ops >> arm_smmu_s1_tlb_ops = { >> .tlb_add_page = arm_smmu_tlb_add_page_s1, >> }; >> >> +const struct iommu_flush_ops arm_smmu_s1_tlb_impl_ops = { >> + .tlb_flush_all = arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context_s1, >> + .tlb_flush_walk = arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk_impl_s1, >> + .tlb_add_page = arm_smmu_tlb_add_page_s1, >> +}; >> + >> static const struct iommu_flush_ops arm_smmu_s2_tlb_ops_v2 = { >> .tlb_flush_all = arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context_s2, >> .tlb_flush_walk = arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk_s2, >> @@ -703,7 +715,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct >> iommu_domain *domain, >> ias = min(ias, 32UL); >> oas = min(oas, 32UL); >> } >> - smmu_domain->flush_ops = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_ops; >> + if (!iommu_get_dma_strict(domain)) >> + smmu_domain->flush_ops = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_impl_ops; >> + else >> + smmu_domain->flush_ops = &arm_smmu_s1_tlb_ops; >> break; >> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED: >> /* > > Any review comments on this version? > Was hoping to get this into 5.15 in case there aren't any concerns here? Let me know if there are any concerns. Thanks, Sai -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation