Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on
 non-x86 EFI platforms
To:     Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
References: <20210625130947.1803678-1-javierm@redhat.com>
 <e61cf77c-6bff-dfcc-d3df-2fb6b48e5897@redhat.com>
 <8dd26141-a09c-39e2-5174-4cad8d21c49c@suse.de>
 <CAPM=9tyfNPa2f5PDBLm4w_H_riEQ5P3rEhX73YGE1y_ygRox+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMj1kXErHteZ+MKYvp=yYmwVxV3A=vjtnG351hZHV+3BPwDQvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YPbJJ/0tSO/fuW7a@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <03f0edef-e54e-8a2a-4b50-683d3d42e249@redhat.com>
 <YPbWrV/cIODdgu6A@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <37e05f02-b810-0cb1-cc4f-95711cd148d9@suse.de>
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <44a75f18-e3a6-f764-b0ec-ce3ac05805a9@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 07:09:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <37e05f02-b810-0cb1-cc4f-95711cd148d9@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hello Thomas,

On 7/20/21 8:38 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 20.07.21 um 15:59 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:42:45PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> On 7/20/21 3:01 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:52AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 04:59, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

>>>>>> Can we just merge via drm-misc and make sure the acks are present and
>>>>>> I'll deal with the fallout if any.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fine with me. Could you stick it on a separate branch so I can double
>>>>> check whether there are any issues wrt the EFI tree?
>>>>
>>>> It'll pop up in linux-next for integration testing or you can pick up the
>>>> patch here for test-merge if you want.
>>>>

This is what Daniel said...

>>>
>>> Thanks a lot Dave and Daniel!
>>
>> Oh I haven't merged them, I'm assuming Thomas will do that. Just figured
> 
> Can I simply put the patches in to drm-misc-next? There was some talk 
> about a topic branch?
>

... which AFAIU means that there's no need for a topic branch, since the
patches will be present in linux-next. And the EFI folks can use that to
check if there are any integration issues or regressions caused by these.
 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat