Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:32:07 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@analog.com>
Cc:     "Tachici, Alexandru" <Alexandru.Tachici@analog.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "nsaenz@kernel.org" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
        "f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "rjui@broadcom.com" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
        "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        "bootc@bootc.net" <bootc@bootc.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] spi: spi-bcm2835: Fix deadlock
Message-ID: <20210721123207.GD4259@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20210716210245.13240-1-alexandru.tachici@analog.com>
 <162680680557.11423.14003826010912823109.b4-ty@kernel.org>
 <PH0PR03MB6366CFFFF5846F7018FFA03699E39@PH0PR03MB6366.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR03MB6366CFFFF5846F7018FFA03699E39@PH0PR03MB6366.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk


--9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 06:47:01AM +0000, Sa, Nuno wrote:
> > To: Tachici, Alexandru <Alexandru.Tachici@analog.com>; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>; nsaenz@kernel.org;
> > f.fainelli@gmail.com; rjui@broadcom.com; swarren@wwwdotorg.org;
> > bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com; bootc@bootc.net; Sa,
> > Nuno <Nuno.Sa@analog.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] spi: spi-bcm2835: Fix deadlock

Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying.  Doing this
makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure
it won't be missed by people scrolling through the irrelevant quoted
material.

> I'm really curious about this one and how should we proceed. Maybe this is not
> new (just to me) and the way to go is just to "fix" the spi controller when we hit the
> issue? I'm asking this because there's a more fundamental problem when this pieces
> align together (CCF + SPI). What I mean is that this can potentially happen in every
> system that happens to have a spi based clock provider and in which the spi controller
> tries to access the CCF in the spi transfer function... Doing a quick and short look I can
> already see that [1], [2], [3] and [4] could hit the same deadlock...

The clock API just doesn't work very well for things on buses that might
sleep, I2C is another example - it's a long standing general issue that
needs to be addressed in the clock framework for example with finer
grained locking but nobody has come up with anything yet.

--9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmD4E8YACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9CYAAf7BWXFxsLJR0wtgTKipOtavmlW4sbr+1qOD4EqV53Q0uCO+u9UhLqhqDKf
pah8nixXNUSfNW6Yc+myXrrwNm9wBBw638E2OMEnFo5w5+/m8cL/a/Y2LQimtpfl
Nw9aWwGaiPUSqbByaPqWQyNgR4VG2N5qN6hLLdCKlkMHI6xejBqc0WBXSmyIDqi3
HVxRS7a9H2GwIYcjyoBtowguYCuD3vPux7eaFPvdBG1D/K8Rn2jHuWXGNb589h/C
6xPnM7jmPghS/CrAL6+YZW3/Iz/iX5TZn9/X82PPQbKd694h+dOSbOLd/MlOx6vi
NsgO/BBT2qkVAX6aoE3Vu+3oNcwJZg==
=VEKT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU--