Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031108AbWKUV6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:58:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031223AbWKUV6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:58:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:16062 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031108AbWKUV6D (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:58:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:56:45 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mattia Dongili , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4) Message-ID: <20061121215645.GD9651@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mattia Dongili , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk References: <20061121212424.GQ5200@stusta.de> <20061121213139.GC9651@redhat.com> <20061121213900.GT5200@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061121213900.GT5200@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1360 Lines: 35 On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:39:00PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 04:31:39PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:24:24PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > Subject : CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND=y compile error > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/17/198 > > > Submitter : alex1000@comcast.net > > > Caused-By : Alexey Starikovskiy > > > commit 05ca0350e8caa91a5ec9961c585c98005b6934ea > > > Handled-By : Mattia Dongili > > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/17/236 > > > Status : patch available > > > > not a regression, easily worked around, queued for .20 > > It is a regression since commit 05ca0350e8caa91a5ec9961c585c98005b6934ea > was merged after 2.6.18. Ah, I misinterpreted when that cset went in (I read the commit date which was back in June, not the merge date, which was september). > Considering that the fix is trivial, why shouldn't it be merged before > 2.6.19? Yes, I'll push it on. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/