Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5703252pxv; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:45:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIJJFHDCpDAp18Nq1ypgn4ykPEgTWfEpLKWIzluHWqAEvO0Inn4jzW5jLi8CUIm0kXcKFa X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2813:: with SMTP id r19mr39227023ejc.150.1626893104506; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:45:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626893104; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ea3FlqkJkcDLzaDVhVEwv56clZPsTrl1ScbUKGzCmTkyWY7d9i/K7eL3sJywxkFFIF GvXzkN3LU6pKic+XsbMZu1WfmrfLv9Bc84rMGbHc8gYOr2M5tS1nHns9b3vWJDQ5H0oP cGi53kdcxiBRnAp8lVVjOs4OPFlJWafu6oIu4Nhlh2X9+NVrlSlebgIhXoDk2uIrs52Y Ad7DvJ3Bd8tsFgeuhm8Mlu8wcx0AUCpyADsLdz98N8kv+dVOhrEQTKIChBvtV1aBo607 suXN7veHo5VPNbJ1IHvFg4X8lWal4JCSDPgn0r4DnNPCW+AjGGjtEkb871VM0IGOK+lz ctOw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=lpzsLI4QrsEYMxTjHPxmKE3kwu26NZIunKsYWD7arkQ=; b=kJBc+dAnuwDfHZ4fsdURztRmJ2WgTpzxQys59HF+jaDIuo7QU+eYKzYTjhrPMSti+v ZXXVn0cfmJ3rNUsjd9Ee9gsGqibNw0RxGTfDLtEXaRViqx7nCIvPGSptC1EusBy6QAiF sEUmlaZRPTjwKI2SYw9NR4l2Q/8SFoxLUhdQ4fhw9tvXh3nLU3+CEnqkdhOHORkhCGQw 3Zv5iydv+4a8N2qSvJC55HKz82yZ8cDI/87NMFK2o8o+SJD9U1THDBfYVGWfzUHH6imN H3UMTF92LpB0rnBHVT7ygxUKxHG29+sF5tngqJqdmQFG4VoR1D1AlZ/AXc+B18Nx8nKu AGvg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q16si29283338edr.89.2021.07.21.11.44.41; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238408AbhGUNXo (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:23:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55744 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236464AbhGUNXo (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:23:44 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1813761245; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 10:04:13 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Pavel Machek Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, David Wysochanski , Chuck Lever , "J. Bruce Fields" , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 147/243] NFSD: Fix TP_printk() format specifier in nfsd_clid_class Message-ID: <20210721100413.227fd0cb@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20210720214847.GB704@amd> References: <20210719144940.904087935@linuxfoundation.org> <20210719144945.657682587@linuxfoundation.org> <20210720214847.GB704@amd> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:48:47 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > [ Upstream commit a948b1142cae66785521a389cab2cce74069b547 ] > > > > Since commit 9a6944fee68e ("tracing: Add a verifier to check string > > pointers for trace events"), which was merged in v5.13-rc1, > > TP_printk() no longer tacitly supports the "%.*s" format specifier. > > > > These are low value tracepoints, so just remove them. > > So I understand we want this for mainline, but AFAICT 5.10 does not > have 9a6944fee68e ("tracing: Add a verifier to check string pointers > for trace events") commit, so this does not fix any bug and removal of > tracepoints can be surprising. > Thanks for pointing this out. I get so many stable patches, I don't have time to look at all of them. Greg, I don't think this should be backported. The verifier code had a bug in it that broke the '%.*s' formats. This patch removed the good code because of the broken code. See eb01f5353bdaa ("tracing: Handle %.*s in trace_check_vprintf()") -- Steve