Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1626853288-31223-1-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
 <1626853288-31223-2-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdYerVu_LyNOJoxMTqhuNd9QBSFWTM7bfRnrsOyrxqE_kw@mail.gmail.com> <YPgsl5M6P86iJADt@ravnborg.org>
In-Reply-To: <YPgsl5M6P86iJADt@ravnborg.org>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:22:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb14g+cn1hKi+gF6oOLMSNLffvuuJbVqR95pmuCtgjHEA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add ilitek ili9341
 panel bindings
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc:     dillon min <dillon.minfei@gmail.com>,
        "thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Noralf_Tr=C3=B8nnes?= <noralf@tronnes.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:18 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:00:35PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:41 AM <dillon.minfei@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Add documentation for "ilitek,ili9341" panel.
> > >
> > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> will you take care to push the patches now you did the review?

Yes but uncertain about patch 2/3 which fixes a DTS file.

Normally that should go through the SoC tree. I'm fine with
applying 1 & 3 but don't want to cause excess errors in schema
validation so I'm a bit ambivalent.

I would prefer if patch 2 gets applied to the SoC tree and
propagate all the way to linux-next before applying patch 1 & 3
but I understand that will take some time.

Yours,
Linus Walleij