Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp361241pxv; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:50:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/9NMZRbUwjLW+jd0SdhURS3lgrIkmPUlcv5MFrDNFtOTw4T5mkBSb4QCvkNmsCgQSke9D X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3699:: with SMTP id a25mr42018209ejc.452.1626943830704; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:50:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626943830; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=R0Yyh6ggSDruOfkkPVY0I3Cmk2kL3cx6V5YGkYk1HWKWyLMQsDhf9252bGxOnDDMu2 0ls3SaoYN49ohVBZ8s+BmAzZWxDXheDet4N9YJIqB1SHExnE1G8AHKGSnByVLvBy/BUS jvEo7hrAsTalawy1J36q9NiEOQMk42zHDOZnWypsvJmqznCWwaaswhuIGcLf9WpzSh61 fOHmI0MA2OyI0Uiee72ZvEY0oZkzmD6ZtMagoV0GQWVeANexF2mLElF1wQ/gjY+vdVjF VyYCTXUuSAblRX6Hk0fqDaJwWE5EDVEgWI1yAmFBhAv/9DmolxXlJVoGlrE6idGOSv99 Qvrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=L0Pww0EWLprwi8AOQBHVDD7uiiN6rzrJJVi7SaxiQ9c=; b=RFu9hQc8UGDdhUxACS6v1VH5J310ILRDkAw/pe3NIEmVmUk46Tr3vmIpVvyO+Tiriw yXTA+GN3lVA3eSMr4GI0uFvScTsO9OJpZddf+pZx0usbbYwmFDQczByY5ypxyR1l1hva eoscN8vBC82axWcyPO6Fgi81Wn5hvfjradwh/hqmccYz71bWkA3hHlSoHeqnsi7syIi+ tZImq4K/FTEjuNQvwqJfNs3+mScMVdwzm2GOMFOV0kyU+uWr7zQ5Ml7YNlb23MM13PwM 9WPY2vQQXJwHiv/ROuPFZBIh8SHDhhaXgN/DCy9rem/xmrirCKcYSOns01P0Ghhvb7Fa vwyg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p4si6982278eju.502.2021.07.22.01.50.07; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231222AbhGVIHB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 04:07:01 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:47724 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230314AbhGVIHB (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 04:07:01 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91983113E; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.6] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9B3D3F73D; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 01:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: Skip priority checks with SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS To: Quentin Perret , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, qais.yousef@arm.com, rickyiu@google.com, wvw@google.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, xuewen.yan94@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com References: <20210719161656.3833943-1-qperret@google.com> <20210719161656.3833943-3-qperret@google.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:47:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210719161656.3833943-3-qperret@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/07/2021 18:16, Quentin Perret wrote: > SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS can be passed to sched_setattr to specify that > the call must not touch scheduling parameters (nice or priority). This What about DL params (runtime, deadline, period)? Uclamp is not for DL but we could (*) still set uclamp values on a DL task. Obviously they would only be used when the task switches policy. On tip/sched/core: root@juno:~# chrt -d -P 1000000000 -T 100000000 -p 0 1671 root@juno:~# uclampset -m200 -M400 -p 1671 root@juno:~# cat /proc/1671/sched | grep uclamp uclamp.min : 200 uclamp.max : 400 effective uclamp.min : 200 effective uclamp.max : 400 root@juno:~# chrt -o -p 0 pid 1702's current scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER pid 1702's current scheduling priority: 0 root@juno:~# cat /proc/1671/sched | grep uclamp uclamp.min : 200 uclamp.max : 400 effective uclamp.min : 200 effective uclamp.max : 400 > is particularly handy for uclamp when used in conjunction with > SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY as that allows to issue a syscall that only > impacts uclamp values. > > However, sched_setattr always checks whether the priorities and nice > values passed in sched_attr are valid first, even if those never get + DL params (__checkparam_dl()) > used down the line. This is useless at best since userspace can > trivially bypass this check to set the uclamp values by specifying low > priorities. However, it is cumbersome to do so as there is no single > expression of this that skips both RT and CFS checks at once. As such, > userspace needs to query the task policy first with e.g. sched_getattr > and then set sched_attr.sched_priority accordingly. This is racy and > slower than a single call. > > As the priority and nice checks are useless when SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS > is specified, simply inherit them in this case to match the policy > inheritance of SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY. > > Reported-by: Wei Wang > Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret > --- > kernel/sched/core.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index e801d2c3077b..914076eab242 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -7332,6 +7332,16 @@ static int sched_copy_attr(struct sched_attr __user *uattr, struct sched_attr *a > return -E2BIG; > } > > +static void get_params(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr) > +{ > + if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) > + __getparam_dl(p, attr); (*) This changes the behaviour when setting uclamp values on a DL task. Before uclamp values could be set but now, because of void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr) .. attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP gets overwritten and __sched_setscheduler() bails in: if (unlikely(policy == p->policy)) { ... retval = 0; goto unlock; } change: I.e. the: if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP) goto change; can't trigger anymore. > + else if (task_has_rt_policy(p)) > + attr->sched_priority = p->rt_priority; > + else > + attr->sched_nice = task_nice(p); > +} > + > /** > * sys_sched_setscheduler - set/change the scheduler policy and RT priority > * @pid: the pid in question. > @@ -7393,6 +7403,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr, > rcu_read_unlock(); > > if (likely(p)) { > + if (attr.sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS) > + get_params(p, &attr); SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS is handled here but SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY outside (before) the `if (likely(p))`? > retval = sched_setattr(p, &attr); > put_task_struct(p); > } [...]