Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp848721pxv; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:57:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbAnzvuIQAuRnC0HfO9GskS6sn6CHc8KHyplujvaL+bNb42ZmIhKWMk5iVBRDC6gWcW9lL X-Received: by 2002:a92:d912:: with SMTP id s18mr1197538iln.172.1626987434331; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:57:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1626987434; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k3Yq5yXILrufcV3V8ffey8xfnQ2/ZozyZstu+jnLNDVM/PEu4N7kt1z9wDDCo8HKQv gzvZzjjm8HJrA9KjRqMOXXuffhED8/Ta1gNmf4dY16/+M5uE5xkcZLe4IHivs2/tmnwd Wk3763f30Fcamv158F0wsouNkVOZLCFfmqCEzPlpkmptul5G60KbHSousq/KB8NXkIqp M1hPVQxUJSB1zmJB3kRoFo2miJ/Zi8l3JoYbSobHamyEdMmT9vnba9l8ho4/37YRLn0w ZbR9QZ0ZrNOhJRDIhze6Of+y8HUYQRMdo3uJtnQz5bGR/0s/V0k4gs5JuMpR5gf0GIaL EovQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=QW3Smr+wQtpk6hqgzaJOQTOjrnrfLmhQdHbfJ0aiQqU=; b=QSuAgfIiiFkznLumwyji0h+z2/IX8OBIKItn/qA4I3lVRqaAAXNCakP4aSv6gJ7YAZ I0ZgLqX0kISVocMv1UDaabLUPTRadKu9jKN3wGdTMjexHqXdY2prTSIHlsQT72ZNcyZk Obo2JD3P1q5sbBxcJ4oDmGNflQYBJYTyFM2RjaSNS4NwTZ1XRw1ZELN6VIimJOTcqYyC 8aThdX7Zrid0mxnKvHw4s17v9g5cFgeC9kprwmNmxUM0S1oGuGS0FBtilMWMyQLSTuXM ExzyP1ijFCRtTkzsLH/xwxSuHXFByhiG6GYdTyu8neU4sPNpZNgfL5UiFQ1j4FxwD14W eZrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h29si21508086jav.81.2021.07.22.13.57.02; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232730AbhGVUOT (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:14:19 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:54377 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231280AbhGVUM1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:12:27 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10053"; a="275560593" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,262,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="275560593" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jul 2021 13:53:01 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,262,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="502035470" Received: from yyu32-desk.sc.intel.com ([143.183.136.146]) by fmsmga003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jul 2021 13:53:00 -0700 From: Yu-cheng Yu To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang , Rick P Edgecombe Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: [PATCH v28 15/32] x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:52:02 -0700 Message-Id: <20210722205219.7934-16-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20210722205219.7934-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> References: <20210722205219.7934-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shadow stack accesses are those that are performed by the CPU where it expects to encounter a shadow stack mapping. These accesses are performed implicitly by CALL/RET at the site of the shadow stack pointer. These accesses are made explicitly by shadow stack management instructions like WRUSSQ. Shadow stacks accesses to shadow-stack mapping can see faults in normal, valid operation just like regular accesses to regular mappings. Shadow stacks need some of the same features like delayed allocation, swap and copy-on-write. Shadow stack accesses can also result in errors, such as when a shadow stack overflows, or if a shadow stack access occurs to a non-shadow-stack mapping. In handling a shadow stack page fault, verify it occurs within a shadow stack mapping. It is always an error otherwise. For valid shadow stack accesses, set FAULT_FLAG_WRITE to effect copy-on-write. Because clearing _PAGE_DIRTY (vs. _PAGE_RW) is used to trigger the fault, shadow stack read fault and shadow stack write fault are not differentiated and both are handled as a write access. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h index 10b1de500ab1..afa524325e55 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ * bit 3 == 1: use of reserved bit detected * bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch * bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access + * bit 6 == 1: shadow stack access fault * bit 15 == 1: SGX MMU page-fault */ enum x86_pf_error_code { @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, + X86_PF_SHSTK = 1 << 6, X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, }; diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index b2eefdefc108..ad3350297e4b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1100,6 +1100,17 @@ access_error(unsigned long error_code, struct vm_area_struct *vma) (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR), foreign)) return 1; + /* + * Verify a shadow stack access is within a shadow stack VMA. + * It is always an error otherwise. Normal data access to a + * shadow stack area is checked in the case followed. + */ + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) { + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) + return 1; + return 0; + } + if (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) { /* write, present and write, not present: */ if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) @@ -1293,6 +1304,14 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address); + /* + * Clearing _PAGE_DIRTY is used to detect shadow stack access. + * This method cannot distinguish shadow stack read vs. write. + * For valid shadow stack accesses, set FAULT_FLAG_WRITE to effect + * copy-on-write. + */ + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) + flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; if (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR) -- 2.21.0