Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:30:17 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Dongjoo Seo <dseo3@uci.edu>
Cc:     SeongJae Park <sj38.park@gmail.com>,
        "Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        acme@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, amit@kernel.org,
        benh@kernel.crashing.org, brendanhiggins@google.com,
        corbet@lwn.net, david@redhat.com, dwmw@amazon.com,
        elver@google.com, fan.du@intel.com, foersleo@amazon.de,
        gthelen@google.com, guoju.fgj@alibaba-inc.com, jgowans@amazon.com,
        joe@perches.com, linux-damon@amazon.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@suse.de,
        mheyne@amazon.de, minchan@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        namhyung@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
        rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, rppt@kernel.org,
        shakeelb@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, sieberf@amazon.com,
        sjpark@amazon.de, snu@zelle79.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
        vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, zgf574564920@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v34 00/13] Introduce Data Access MONitor (DAMON)
Message-ID: <YPpwCS4CpGtJTy9t@kroah.com>
References: <2E16FC36-18B4-4F92-86AE-51249CCDB1A4@uci.edu>
 <YPpq4u+b/UzAE/3u@kroah.com>
 <23F9BFF6-51B0-4EF7-AF2F-278F89D310C3@uci.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <23F9BFF6-51B0-4EF7-AF2F-278F89D310C3@uci.edu>
Precedence: bulk

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 04:16:27PM +0900, Dongjoo Seo wrote:
> Thank you for your comment!.
> 
> It has been a long time since Nvidia ended supporting the new kernel
> version on tx2 boards, but for researchers, this set of boards (tx2,
> px2, agx) is a very attractive candidate to use.

But why are you stuck at a known-buggy and insecure kernel version?  I
would work on fixing that first, before worrying about new features.

good luck!

greg k-h