Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756177AbWKVRz3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:55:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756179AbWKVRz3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:55:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:49537 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756177AbWKVRz2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:55:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:27:30 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: ltt-dev@shafik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Debugfs : inotify, multiple calls to debugfs_create_file, remove Message-ID: <20061122052730.GD20836@kroah.com> References: <20061120181838.GB7328@Krystal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061120181838.GB7328@Krystal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1728 Lines: 40 On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 01:18:38PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I just had to add inotify support to my LTTng consumer so I could inform it > of the presence of new CPUs (for CPU hotplug). I noticed that no > notification event was being sent when a debugfs file is created from within > the kernel through debugfs_create. There are probably other notifications > missing, but here is the patch adding the one I care about. Should it be added > in libfs or in debugfs ? So does this fix the inotify issue? > A second problem I noticed is when a caller calls debugfs_create_file more than > once : the result is that the debugfs_remove will fail. I guess the second call > to debugfs_create_file increments the reference counts (there is not fix for > this issue in my patch). > > Third problem : a failing call to debugfs_remove keeps the filesystem pinned. > (fixed by calling simple_release_fs in the error path). > > The third problem : When a process is in a directory, the call to simple_rmdir > will fail. Debugfs does not use its return value. I noticed that calling > simple_unlink on a directory when simple_rmdir fails removes the directory that > would otherwise be left there. I am not sure if this approach is correct > through. > > This patch is against Linux 2.6.18. Care to split this into 4 different patches (you seem to have 4 issues here), so that it's easier to see them, and it will follow the 1-patch-per-issue rule? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/