Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1274929pxv; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:32:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjiE3oBZMrC8a8Ih9z2rp5rxqeYLC977h0RNC43+B/zLu/rry9iJJ0HxouIUxVt1zOtSRA X-Received: by 2002:a92:c5c2:: with SMTP id s2mr3264091ilt.180.1627039943465; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:32:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627039943; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1LzMJ3R3mFi4hAwlAv5JRgDu1SWXj7h/5e79RnVd6JFpwYxup5yivv4KW5nqK1GLDe G3N70TneZgzn7GSa768bA39XqjNLslXK696ZS1/DQ+iurFy/CQMbEwp5hseWuNV2OQAP AbWv6/7h8JPgPiZw9YsW45SFrYFQZ3TapgHpWhKERZEkhDl9XXz985Sx3rTk5VsBeClx 5etdmZ+KO88ikBFoCC74aXsp/nY/NIsy7/9yU91MKKPIbcP4HSrAHwnE2j+o0DyfIx1v 3SQNxpx/c8OVwrb2aOEQoTStwWmFN9qYSyK4v0Dt2CRlggPuYuYU/LbR4wuga9r/Xwj8 9O9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=sQJQk5bcPjyTMlCQd0KzChcR7IkcLHhVlzWHaX7oFLw=; b=e5RHQ5Zo7HFHriCG8qEBbTIIlYBrpavXJdpMhxuFNS9QPEy4jKfHGtdpjCHT246n2B 9uIEerFqDx4Jm4t34HRWiHM9usUNH2hzTzGmbv59RU4vXJ9TgKmxxYNhVsjKVC0Nq01e u7Cs6+MgM9QfnBhOluFZG4wKq1UiMvkio3ZaVNNnOsLHE193RIwJCpvrtBxyJCtAJR4V Wh6E1jvvOmpLjbv6kTxnNm8IRo0UjEPq0i+kE9m4EjcDStssiURa3TOJJEOAcpTt8jOq 0KFmJyxDReVcZ8OD0NMfh2hNL1sp43D/LbUs3uC8SzIpJhoMVjm+pg6kbn9T/16q43xV WAPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hwD3tmbQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n21si25224313jaj.97.2021.07.23.04.32.11; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hwD3tmbQ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234255AbhGWKtp (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 06:49:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50626 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231703AbhGWKto (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 06:49:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D66EC061575; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id hp25so3038871ejc.11; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:30:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=sQJQk5bcPjyTMlCQd0KzChcR7IkcLHhVlzWHaX7oFLw=; b=hwD3tmbQD7AFuwr6hEpWXQbho/UNBthijCONnzdkL2bImKoMU1MnUkF3V8UeHGH7li zG+aqp4rdV44DUpsRPxEn6HQE+HYmacQOd53JRpPA8Sx0l8bvE901MzGEoVTfZeKJPNj jse8feHAD8hU04Fb2aZApsLppt5GnQ3+maEJ/kvlZ/CAubK4ebyKkSSYkyH9LIeAgY5S PilRfUtI1e9vxf55HgIM++t/YBUEfFXdC0aI0yvd++sgYcpsrD3twlYutglriqMEQYzP 9ZrmHyJtGI18/uqmbT5LKbrymRRtp+mMcQVIOugUaITZ2tAM58eHT9Mx13uYByNX/LI5 2TyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=sQJQk5bcPjyTMlCQd0KzChcR7IkcLHhVlzWHaX7oFLw=; b=GJ08Zzvrdh2JtK8kpOElJTGeGStBdjqn3PTtufqw1KwAiIkX1n7AUufaNogHA1j7X0 Dy0MVQz0U5paSNF9A5Te/NMvsGZcF56f9NJCNAjm4kKo3kNM3U4klVK/3KNr5/Td3gJA JRAb3Z+8vJUIujlM1VCy9fLrQbeh27zpoi5WJCx6FE50H41n/PY44Z6CEr2K6m+WqDZ2 VVJY8TpKOe6BGlfCDikDtz2owtsYoekXyVQFJodGAylGhrnO0jq3c65DMXr0jI4wjU5b t+pShR0WWzLCdz/wY4r26znklDD0Y5Z6XGnJjHF8BzPbbjotr1xu+iU7vgUQPFBaLlTM nCsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pTwzTxOcJroh5G6CfXQ0VOjYyrUSbsXlNyZxwY5OfG8xS5wYf MzXZigrvm1ueAhvJojMbX+w= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8301:: with SMTP id j1mr4274146ejx.0.1627039816593; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ansuel-xps.localdomain (host-79-26-254-101.retail.telecomitalia.it. [79.26.254.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm1sm10565161ejb.38.2021.07.23.04.30.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:30:18 +0200 From: Ansuel Smith To: Michael Walle Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, f.fainelli@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC] dsa: register every port with of_platform Message-ID: References: <20210723110505.9872-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> <20210723111328.20949-1-michael@walle.cc> <168cb1440ebe1cff4a7b5e343502638a@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <168cb1440ebe1cff4a7b5e343502638a@walle.cc> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 01:25:02PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2021-07-23 13:18, schrieb Ansuel Smith: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 01:13:28PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > > > The declaration of a different mac-addr using the nvmem framework is > > > > currently broken. The dsa code uses the generic of_get_mac_address where > > > > the nvmem function requires the device node to be registered in the > > > > of_platform to be found by of_find_device_by_node. Register every port > > > > > > Which tree are you on? This should be fixed with > > > > > > f10843e04a07 of: net: fix of_get_mac_addr_nvmem() for non-platform > > > devices > > > > > > -michael > > > > Thx a lot for the hint. So yes I missed that the problem was already > > fixed. Sorry for the mess. Any idea if that will be backported? > > I didn't include a Fixes tag, so it won't be automatically > backported. Also I'm not sure if it qualifies for the stable trees > because no in-tree users seem to be affected, no? > > -michael Also the patch seems very large. Anyway again thx a lot for the work and the quick hint. Time to backport to 5.10 and 5.4 for openwrt.