Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:54:54 -0500
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/29] arm64: dts: qcom: Harmonize DWC USB3 DT nodes name
Message-ID: <YPsejtV31WrYJX7e@yoga>
References: <20201020115959.2658-30-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
 <CALAqxLX_FNvFndEDWtGbFPjSzuAbfqxQE07diBJFZtftwEJX5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210714124807.o22mottsrg3tv6nt@mobilestation>
 <YPfPDqJhfzbvDLvB@kroah.com>
 <20210721100220.ddfxwugivsndsedv@mobilestation>
 <YPf29+ewbrYgHxRP@kroah.com>
 <YPh/AS5svBk+gddY@yoga>
 <YPp7Q4IofUYQlrqd@kroah.com>
 <YPrTbC7fNOY3qCcJ@yoga>
 <YPrmTYQJ33AIxcwP@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YPrmTYQJ33AIxcwP@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri 23 Jul 10:54 CDT 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 09:34:20AM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri 23 Jul 03:18 CDT 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 03:09:37PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > Which tree did you revert this in? 5.13.stable?)
> > > 
> > > My usb-linus branch which will go to Linus later today.  Then we can
> > > backport the revert to older kernels as needed.
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm not worried about the backports, I'm worried about conflicts you're
> > causing because you're taking a non-usb patch through the usb tree.
> > 
> > I was about to push a revert (to this and the other Qualcomm platforms),
> > but as you're taking some set of reverts through the usb tree we're just
> > in for a bunch of merge conflicts.
> 
> It shouldn't be a merge conflict as you can apply the same revert to
> your tree now and keep on merging.  When you pick up 5.14-rc3 from Linus
> it should merge "correctly", right?
> 

I typically don't merge back the -rcs into my -next branch, is that
common practice?


But I still don't understand why you insist on driving this through your
tree. I've asked you several times to show me on the patch so I at least
can Ack it. I made a mistake, but why do you insist on keeping me - the
maintainer - out of the loop?

Regards,
Bjorn