Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1696651pxv; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:04:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9oeufoDB71Fb9TSf8pnKQoS3VtGviqfvCXOG/2Et+IteTOd+1xc+egLI3OIvEHU7wy+dK X-Received: by 2002:a6b:794b:: with SMTP id j11mr5408789iop.129.1627077846057; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:04:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627077846; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XfjHGkfiuSu7qQ5p2rPhEfpP6rh6VO9P/BECM47xGv09Q/JkB88DlQ0lz9HjEUw/Dn WaN8lL8DijWoYw6pD2s4LVDZfZ9ka+73AhL++y4ft0r4Lj68Cr5ymh4/4jXtzOBtKgBv mTSMoaNGqpGytEMTM751Ipbj9LrgaHF7CmCaiY6I08qUlgr8Vz1wmhlk+bCWGe2ciWE+ xrEtUpihx5RGjZhzbGtcsqrO5oz/uM5xofavzVRfAtwqBySDUB5Gg2txHxU0tYv0RRvP XWDUp5orje9An/LA/WISD4W88ew2caoZMWddXQaLj7kOkkrWc9pjVvU1dASJmbVbNpox zpWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=tmt40VljwZriRvnYPHHKsHluHt2xVQ0s6GnCHp0OqVw=; b=q9FI4ehvUpsPzofwZTnPY+ZY3haaL1ub5yv7zCa5LKfwlYRl5b4m50AoElqPQIN34t TXQhP9rpDCaq3IYsWF8eZ8tADXIOFA5N3dkn44+hx5D+Z5kRC8EciDK9bxkQM6l7Tvvn Wn71uQpRbYc3MUErGEzyzxysNPmkhtBinm9nu58euP1p23LoHP3nZoN16ybVBEHzahIL c/AHrIPEEF+AYHDPHWTBhkWWte2XlERJLUu+7rIakXrN6A84IsEO6yjmd2GXMmI2mOGt SEjpu1YhIUq8OuxsqBed9oyyst4pVgLJzhvWdccv7+1tARjV75i3Sbc5aZRLoV/mDCKq oDhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=eIz8rlcT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z9si36964415ilu.28.2021.07.23.15.03.54; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=eIz8rlcT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232527AbhGWVWZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:22:25 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:46620 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232226AbhGWVWX (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:22:23 -0400 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16NM2oBN056679; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1627077770; bh=tmt40VljwZriRvnYPHHKsHluHt2xVQ0s6GnCHp0OqVw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=eIz8rlcTZWzthu5bpp2vqFUDYOhp8uNylhGqdG4XKxAkx0VOlil3oI8dX4gwf5hro JkBYjuaU1xDrmQ/D71Rmutp8X0IMgX9UAL8P1mGK33wuU9WHhAK2r89ZKFrl79vBD3 uVIF7NiqMuJw1r1DEoL8R4yjimUEMO7f5Stg7G8Q= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 16NM2oHA065034 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:50 -0500 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:50 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:50 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16NM2oIX025377; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:50 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.38.176]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 16NM2oYM126734; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:50 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier CC: Lokesh Vutla , Praneeth Bajjuri , Hari Nagalla , , , , Suman Anna Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20210723220248.6554-4-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210723220248.6554-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20210723220248.6554-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Add support to the K3 R5F remoteproc driver to configure all the R5F cores to be either in IPC-only mode or the traditional remoteproc mode. The IPC-only mode expects that the remote processors are already booted by the bootloader, and only performs the minimum steps required to initialize and deinitialize the virtio IPC transports. The remoteproc mode allows the kernel remoteproc driver to do the regular load and boot and other device management operations for a R5F core. The IPC-only mode for a R5F core is detected and configured at driver probe time by querying the System Firmware for the R5F power and reset state and/or status and making sure that the R5F core is indeed started by the bootloaders, otherwise the device is configured for remoteproc mode. Support for IPC-only mode is achieved through .attach(), .detach() and .get_loaded_rsc_table() callback ops and zeroing out the regular rproc ops .prepare(), .unprepare(), .start() and .stop(). The resource table follows a design-by-contract approach and is expected to be at the base of the DDR firmware region reserved for each remoteproc, it is mostly expected to contain only the virtio device and trace resource entries. NOTE: The driver cannot configure a R5F core for remoteproc mode by any means without rebooting the kernel if that R5F core has been started by a bootloader. This is the current desired behavior and can be enhanced in the future if the feature is needed. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- v2: Addressed various review comments from v1 - Reworked the logic to not use remoteproc detach_on_shutdown and local ipc-only state flags - Plugged in the required IPC-only ops dynamically with the regular remoteproc-mode ops zeroed out - Dropped all the unneeded error checks in start, stop, prepare, unprepare, attach and detach callbacks - Callback function descriptions updated to reflect the mode they apply to - Switched to dev_info for the mode information traces from dev_err - Revised the last 2 paras of the patch description v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20210522000309.26134-5-s-anna@ti.com/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 196 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index 03f930758b2d..12658368aed6 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc) * private to each core. Only Core0 needs to be unhalted for running the * cluster in this mode. The function uses the same reset logic as LockStep * mode for this (though the behavior is agnostic of the reset release order). + * This callback is invoked only in remoteproc mode. */ static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) { @@ -493,7 +494,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) * both cores. The access is made possible only with releasing the resets for * both cores, but with only Core0 unhalted. This function re-uses the same * reset assert logic as LockStep mode for this mode (though the behavior is - * agnostic of the reset assert order). + * agnostic of the reset assert order). This callback is invoked only in + * remoteproc mode. */ static int k3_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) { @@ -527,7 +529,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) * * The Single-CPU mode on applicable SoCs (eg: AM64x) only uses Core0 to execute * code, so only Core0 needs to be unhalted. The function uses the same logic - * flow as Split-mode for this. + * flow as Split-mode for this. This callback is invoked only in remoteproc + * mode. */ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) { @@ -598,7 +601,8 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) * be done here, but is preferred to be done in the .unprepare() ops - this * maintains the symmetric behavior between the .start(), .stop(), .prepare() * and .unprepare() ops, and also balances them well between sysfs 'state' - * flow and device bind/unbind or module removal. + * flow and device bind/unbind or module removal. This callback is invoked + * only in remoteproc mode. */ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) { @@ -635,6 +639,78 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) return ret; } +/* + * Attach to a running R5F remote processor (IPC-only mode) + * + * The R5F attach callback only needs to request the mailbox, the remote + * processor is already booted, so there is no need to issue any TI-SCI + * commands to boot the R5F cores in IPC-only mode. This callback is invoked + * only in IPC-only mode. + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(rproc); + if (ret) + return ret; + + dev_info(dev, "R5F core initialized in IPC-only mode\n"); + return 0; +} + +/* + * Detach from a running R5F remote processor (IPC-only mode) + * + * The R5F detach callback performs the opposite operation to attach callback + * and only needs to release the mailbox, the R5F cores are not stopped and + * will be left in booted state in IPC-only mode. This callback is invoked + * only in IPC-only mode. + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + dev_info(dev, "R5F core deinitialized in IPC-only mode\n"); + return 0; +} + +/* + * This function implements the .get_loaded_rsc_table() callback and is used + * to provide the resource table for the booted R5F in IPC-only mode. The K3 R5F + * firmwares follow a design-by-contract approach and are expected to have the + * resource table at the base of the DDR region reserved for firmware usage. + * This provides flexibility for the remote processor to be booted by different + * bootloaders that may or may not have the ability to publish the resource table + * address and size through a DT property. This callback is invoked only in + * IPC-only mode. + */ +static struct resource_table *k3_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, + size_t *rsc_table_sz) +{ + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + + if (!kproc->rmem[0].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "memory-region #1 does not exist, loaded rsc table can't be found"); + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + } + + /* + * NOTE: The resource table size is currently hard-coded to a maximum + * of 256 bytes. The most common resource table usage for K3 firmwares + * is to only have the vdev resource entry and an optional trace entry. + * The exact size could be computed based on resource table address, but + * the hard-coded value suffices to support the IPC-only mode. + */ + *rsc_table_sz = 256; + return (struct resource_table *)kproc->rmem[0].cpu_addr; +} + /* * Internal Memory translation helper * @@ -1014,6 +1090,116 @@ static void k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) } } +/* + * This function checks and configures a R5F core for IPC-only or remoteproc + * mode. The driver is configured to be in IPC-only mode for a R5F core when + * the core has been loaded and started by a bootloader. The IPC-only mode is + * detected by querying the System Firmware for reset, power on and halt status + * and ensuring that the core is running. Any incomplete steps at bootloader + * are validated and errored out. + * + * In IPC-only mode, the driver state flags for ATCM, BTCM and LOCZRAMA settings + * and cluster mode parsed originally from kernel DT are updated to reflect the + * actual values configured by bootloader. The driver internal device memory + * addresses for TCMs are also updated. + */ +static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; + struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; + struct device *cdev = core->dev; + bool r_state = false, c_state = false; + u32 ctrl = 0, cfg = 0, stat = 0, halted = 0; + u64 boot_vec = 0; + u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama; + struct k3_r5_core *core0; + enum cluster_mode mode; + int ret; + + core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); + + ret = core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(core->ti_sci, core->ti_sci_id, + &r_state, &c_state); + if (ret) { + dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + if (r_state != c_state) { + dev_warn(cdev, "R5F core may have been powered on by a different host, programmed state (%d) != actual state (%d)\n", + r_state, c_state); + } + + ret = reset_control_status(core->reset); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, + &stat); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial processor status, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + atcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN ? 1 : 0; + btcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN ? 1 : 0; + loczrama = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE ? 1 : 0; + if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) { + mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE ? + CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; + } else { + mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP ? + CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; + } + halted = ctrl & PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT; + + /* + * IPC-only mode detection requires both local and module resets to + * be deasserted and R5F core to be unhalted. Local reset status is + * irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset + * deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode + */ + if (c_state && !ret && !halted) { + dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n"); + kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED; + ret = 1; + /* override rproc ops with only required IPC-only mode ops */ + kproc->rproc->ops->prepare = NULL; + kproc->rproc->ops->unprepare = NULL; + kproc->rproc->ops->start = NULL; + kproc->rproc->ops->stop = NULL; + kproc->rproc->ops->attach = k3_r5_rproc_attach; + kproc->rproc->ops->detach = k3_r5_rproc_detach; + kproc->rproc->ops->get_loaded_rsc_table = + k3_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table; + } else if (!c_state) { + dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for remoteproc mode\n"); + ret = 0; + } else { + dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n", + !ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted", + c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted", + halted ? "halted" : "unhalted"); + ret = -EINVAL; + } + + /* fixup TCMs, cluster & core flags to actual values in IPC-only mode */ + if (ret > 0) { + if (core == core0) + cluster->mode = mode; + core->atcm_enable = atcm_enable; + core->btcm_enable = btcm_enable; + core->loczrama = loczrama; + core->mem[0].dev_addr = loczrama ? 0 : K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR; + core->mem[1].dev_addr = loczrama ? K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR : 0; + } + + return ret; +} + static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); @@ -1054,6 +1240,12 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) kproc->rproc = rproc; core->rproc = rproc; + ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(kproc); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_config; + if (ret) + goto init_rmem; + ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure(kproc); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "initial configure failed, ret = %d\n", @@ -1061,6 +1253,7 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_config; } +init_rmem: k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(kproc); ret = k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(kproc); -- 2.32.0