Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3332462pxv; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx64i9fcTDKF/kbGG0eCRyuSf3T72ccoNRDxkv49IVnm3FdBrZ4EEQr4xPWIzf1Vzzu/pg1 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d37:: with SMTP id dh23mr19601920edb.360.1627288193178; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627288193; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IcvIaWaChxj6A0g5h1VftckCT/ZKjrgHpcN8i2jzhIHKDroGMtOaaWGwV/2HlduRGq VE08+ha83yiTlwRdtpf8tUcg4pV3XnaHsQg2ZMUe/rmRTNEBBG23avP2NUf4x6+INKPC byZSVBx2ahyGDmqSMpLMGEpMG5MgquGFYvXUliwHlAN632SZQt420MHyYh66TWL1XN8J NsDXrQRApHy/cEXWHdJ8QrGe5ZEMj8e9qhSBrY+Bl8Bl1QwezLwZmhwH+3VaKe6CzOwp 19D1twWghz+AfDNuGVYSE7le0Afqb4bFLZo5JVc04NbYJDiyESRHplGrDFWcqAqIOAP7 yElQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from:authenticated-by; bh=BlAN9uUBoX8OD/uJCoBrhcuAXyaPNZHs2kqx2BEXJJI=; b=zqyYpBS7ZZrMlAcwOOjiAyiziDKUR6E13EeG1l7OQH590mXg4788PiFCEwQJSsRdLR bZDR0/QI3iB2yR/1JKwTR9me7Xpi4yqmn24EKnqVcbhioAb/03OVMKxfd0BnmCxFX1Xk rJ73xjUb2nvMOq4aytEzIS33s6GBLMlcsx21Zp2vM8QpKsRh8n8Un1DXT2zaME/2N33g GFDCmMIwevuSX8XiTDgdJtX97Nwwky9sUw7v7YAtvL0LmXVvu766wVF54LmM9WYndCdq 8qjTzsL0fommf3XYZllGxusEwlQDSTw+oJVkEaCNctCPyIjNPg2EHedJ5uWx9yUsEwU5 klMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q5si41639292edi.242.2021.07.26.01.29.29; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232894AbhGZHpn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:45:43 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com ([211.75.126.72]:55731 "EHLO rtits2.realtek.com.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231774AbhGZHpm (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:45:42 -0400 Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.73 with qID 16Q8Q25q8028578, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36502.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.25]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.71/5.88) with ESMTPS id 16Q8Q25q8028578 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:26:02 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS05.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.98) by RTEXH36502.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:26:01 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXMBS05.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:26:01 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::5bd:6f71:b434:7c91]) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::5bd:6f71:b434:7c91%5]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:26:00 +0800 From: Hayes Wang To: Greg KH CC: "kuba@kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , nic_swsd , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next RESEND 2/2] r8152: separate the r8152.c into r8152_main.c and r8152_fw.c Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next RESEND 2/2] r8152: separate the r8152.c into r8152_main.c and r8152_fw.c Thread-Index: AQHXgdL4UhnFIS2opkGLRT1L0R8XUatUWD4AgACR1mA= Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:26:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1394712342-15778-368-Taiwan-albertk@realtek.com> <1394712342-15778-371-Taiwan-albertk@realtek.com> <1394712342-15778-373-Taiwan-albertk@realtek.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US Content-Language: zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.21.177.203] x-kse-serverinfo: RTEXMBS05.realtek.com.tw, 9 x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: =?us-ascii?Q?Clean,_bases:_2021/7/26_=3F=3F_06:00:00?= x-kse-bulkmessagesfiltering-scan-result: protection disabled Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36502.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled X-KSE-AntiSpam-Outbound-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-AntiSpam-Version: 5.9.20, Database issued on: 07/26/2021 08:11:54 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Status: KAS_STATUS_NOT_DETECTED X-KSE-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Lua profiles 165233 [Jul 26 2021] X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Version: 5.9.20.0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Envelope from: hayeswang@realtek.com X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 449 449 5db59deca4a4f5e6ea34a93b13bc730e229092f4 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_from_domain_doesnt_match_to} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: realtek.com:7.1.1;d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.com:7.1.1;127.0.0.199:7.1.2 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Status: not_detected X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Auth:dkim=none X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Heuristic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 07/26/2021 08:15:00 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH > Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 3:37 PM [...] > That is a lot of different things all happening in one commit, why? I plan to separate the file into two files. And I find I need an additional header file for it, so The patch includes adding that header file. > Please break this up into "one patch per change" and submit it that way. > > But the real question is why break this file up in the first place? > What is wrong with the way it is today? What future changes require > this file to be in smaller pieces? If none, why make this? If there > are future changes, then please submit this change when you submit > those, as that would show a real need. The purpose is let me easy to maintain the driver. The code is larger and larger. And I find that the r8169.c has been separated into three files. Therefore, I think maybe I could split the driver into small parts like r8169. Then, the code wouldn't be complex. Should I abandon these patches? Best Regards, Hayes