Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3419057pxv; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:56:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywA+PUROaRWOpBXTFz3pUp/Ie/nJ6xImLlfG8FmSKbzMZvPV4M+3Nd0WlfUuM2Sl9/nGp3 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2bd6:: with SMTP id r205mr14593383ior.122.1627296965053; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:56:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627296965; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uN4XqFr3sw1DYeHf+6fiZosDuxKQ+mF3xG1lDZ1xi7f1sY+y94rpRpfVGi5EZQGjGN FfIS8MDgtCHAr5DuadAbjkkp0CNwDTTQQCtcAZuds77k0Zu7BoxrIv1DaTE483V6re2t rIHDHqR9E1B8coj03a6lBSXVMmU16yO9jigTsvURpG//+w86JYtTu280Q0Bjh1YgMTHO g6QXvO0drlNFhtpDa/ezO5KBRAzipr5h4u5VLzeS6fc5QSXfGDnesSfFyv7wf8v/3O0D 2eG2XtrpGLAZaRVezk/B0jBz7zpbPITG0WI4q12Qk/0kRlrkXMMvz32WK+TMqgBabzvQ T5LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=LmSALKNDOgRDK2aneJCTF3OYyMHaF6di15QWm7EHXh0=; b=VgTJCsusXund808p1ryHjyxBpsTirMbcXQxm8595bbE6+z9PhYOgeUXRftJBi/6vRo 2CE9qw55oMSgxVofLZwmlTysZy8/PTOvOyE4Axe8oO7R9KMWlqjZWS3gAXncVmsvk+f5 83AD9f7az/hgooP7z+Mw8TljVeBNYuECYrZwWoV/zZbUe//unkdjOJL12HphYlRH0GjH xMn1ok85pRfFUuuL5BWyAkRHhOTUucFwQhTZEJ7HFXD+g0y1ByyVWozFue2x4XJVhaAR L8p95A7QBrKb8iy8Bqosxl4xdkBpSPRt5ELSOULQ9nVKUD4MaTaNfD6VmARHID1RO6qT 7Bpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f16si15388058ilc.93.2021.07.26.03.55.53; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231976AbhGZKOe (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:14:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:50110 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231792AbhGZKOd (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:14:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B49911B3; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.64.156]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 161663F70D; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:54:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:54:00 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Sumit Garg Cc: Jens Wiklander , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , OP-TEE TrustedFirmware , Marc Bonnici , Sudeep Holla , Jerome Forissier , sughosh.ganu@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add FF-A support in OP-TEE driver Message-ID: <20210726105400.2li4fj223u3vajly@bogus> References: <20210722121757.1944658-1-jens.wiklander@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 03:59:36PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 17:48, Jens Wiklander wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This adds supports for the OP-TEE driver to communicate with secure world > > using FF-A [1] as transport. > > > > There is one change to the TEE subsystem with "tee: add sec_world_id to > > struct tee_shm" to add support for holding globally unique handle assigned > > by the FF-A. This is a field that I believe could useful for the AMDTEE > > driver too. > > > > For communication the OP-TEE message protocol is still used, but with a new > > type of memory reference, struct optee_msg_param_fmem, to carry the > > information needed by FF-A. The OP-TEE driver is refactored internally with > > to sets of callbacks, one for the old SMC based communication and another > > set with FF-A as transport. The functions relating to the SMC based ABI > > are moved to smc_abi.c while the FF-A based ABI is added in a ffa_abi.c. > > > > There is also a difference in how the drivers are instantiated. With the > > SMC based transport we have a platform driver, module_platform_driver(), > > today which we're keeping as is for this configuration. In a FF-A system we > > have a FF-A driver, module_ffa_driver(), instead. > > > > The OP-TEE driver can be compiled for both targets at the same time and > > it's up to runtime configuration (device tree or ACPI) to decide how it's > > initialized. Note that it's only the old SMC based driver instance that > > need device tree or ACPI to initialize. The FF-A based driver relies on the > > FF-A bus instead. > > > > This can be tested QEMU > > The repo for SPMC at S-EL1 retrieved by > > repo init -u https://github.com/jenswi-linaro/manifest.git -m > > qemu_v8.xml -b ffav4_spmc > > repo sync > > # Then checkout the branch optee_ffa_v3 from > > # git://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git > > # in the linux directory > > > > To build do: > > cd build > > make toolchains > > make all > > > > To boot: > > make run-only > > > > Test with xtest, perhaps only with the command "xtest 1004" in case you're > > not interested in too many tests. > > Thanks Jens for sharing instructions to test this feature. So I tried > to reproduce using following repo versions: > > linux-tee, branch: optee_ffa_v3 > trusted-firmware-a, branch: ffav4_sel1_spmc > build, branch: ffav4_spmc > > and rest of the repos synced to the latest version as per upstream > qemu_v8.xml [1] but I don't see OP-TEE driver being probed during boot > [2]. Am I missing something? > > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/manifest/blob/master/qemu_v8.xml > [2] > Welcome to Buildroot, type root or test to login > buildroot login: root > # dmesg | grep optee > Do you see ARM FF-A driver initialised successfully ? You must see "ARM FF-A Version 1.0 found" or something similar based on the actual version supported. If so, can you check if the partitions are correctly populated by the driver using the discover API. $ grep "" /sys/bus/arm_ffa/devices/*/uuid If uuid reads zeros, then the devices are populated, just the matching driver is not found(due to the workaround for v1.0 spec) -- Regards, Sudeep