Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757256AbWKWJBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:01:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757275AbWKWJBR (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:01:17 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59264 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757256AbWKWJBQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:01:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 09:01:16 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Greg KH , ltt-dev@shafik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] libfs : file/directory removal fix, 2.6.18 Message-ID: <20061123090116.GK3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20061120181838.GB7328@Krystal> <20061122052730.GD20836@kroah.com> <20061123082244.GF1703@Krystal> <20061123085056.GJ3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061123085056.GJ3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1653 Lines: 40 On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 08:50:56AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:22:44AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Fix file and directory removal in libfs. Add inotify support for file removal. > > > > The following scenario : > > create dir a > > create dir a/b > > > > cd a/b (some process goes in cwd a/b) > > > > rmdir a/b > > rmdir a > > > > fails due to the fact that "a" appears to be non empty. > > What? Caller will do d_delete() itself. Care to show a version where > that would happen and post an strace of the second rmdir? > > > It is because the "b" > > dentry is not deleted from "a" and still in use. The same problem happens if > > "b" is a file. d_delete is nice enough to know when it needs to unhash and free > > the dentry if nothing else is using it or, if someone is using it, to remove it > > from the hash queues and wait for it to be deleted when it has no users. > > > > The nice side-effect of this fix is that it calls the file removal > > notification. > > NAK. First of all, I won't believe you without actual strace. > > What's more, WTF would fs _method_ call idiotify? Keep that crap > out of filesystems; caller will do it for us just fine. PS: debugfs, sysfs et sodding alia should take care to do things equivalent to vfs_unlink(), etc. _That_ is definitive user of fs methods, which, in turn, sets the rules for library helpers used by such. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/