Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3551734pxv; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7BjN6VLXVIAnsD/3EYtF7AIo14p5/s4X0o+JvX2GFQMT6Kw2MOs+crnANU8dR5dc+XCWg X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:58e:: with SMTP id a14mr16559206jar.81.1627306982198; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627306982; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jWaa9WQ7g+4oOgFxG4TsnTzvY2+SjVrp5G4vuWiWD+rPUvMomdcUT/S9dZKJVW0RaG MtZm511PFyUEzaeozCpZuED+lwVp2EwWa1W1u3e2yl1jZeUzRYxpnv0y3x4XdhUJyhUf FI6tdQ4yKGR79p/q1xzMhzyAgXI60qdOoQg+sMMQlAldrE4EnLOnLR6Q+fXJmmAAPY/h OSkoM3UnmPVbKZVWuFDdsnKUmf0vBl2dEkEbrW2L3SEYjjod+hc3Ojzy4Z1ag8OkURke P3vOHppNi+Xa4y0VZRbLVvLe2sr2S++0G6jZDOcjTaFnBoadPZZ2FKsR8jH4xj7XgT4W fsMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=sZEXE2uzysLmthmSJ58f1balcpVTNtGQAl91/zdxEGE=; b=LW5N8rBCMQyzcTCIKBjSnL5N47zU1EuwCqAc9VUuTcZ6+f0nsYWOeWKy0AhBMBw+Az WvXrTEDHLbX9Z36UZT6oeqp2XQ1eZ0vo01vXaTqnkYC0hcGNRn+oObgohjCxUNNTt1BC gvZsZTAhnmuAlLn7RZXaIwLnBUeDwun/3v7U5fNaLwEp+bBF9BVtTEqBAYGocu/YTC2x xpVzSexunWArjgvTp7P56f9ccHgXd0XH0u42zp2rFoqrbANJoIiIwBiyM/xaLAjAYOSZ zFmUgMk0o27heSjJ8B7kz6RDhOFM61SdNxz/B8rbfQMUe4PtAi8ukuvWCIT5dhGHiQHt lyHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k6si1548380ior.96.2021.07.26.06.42.50; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233963AbhGZNA1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:00:27 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:52018 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233719AbhGZM7G (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:59:06 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE6B139F; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3CF33F70D; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 06:39:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: Pavel Machek , Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , John Kacur , Daniel Wagner , Tom Zanussi , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , stable@kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Ingo Molnar , Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 5/8] sched: Fix affine_move_task() self-concurrency In-Reply-To: <20210725050349.GA983@bug> References: <20210709215953.122804544@goodmis.org> <20210709220018.003428207@goodmis.org> <20210725050349.GA983@bug> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:39:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87zgu9kxdc.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25/07/21 07:03, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> 5.10.47-rt46-rc1 stable review patch. >> If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> >> Add set_affinity_pending::stop_pending, to indicate if a stopper is in >> progress. >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c >> index 9cbe12d8c5bd..20588a59300d 100644 >> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c >> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c >> @@ -1900,6 +1900,7 @@ struct migration_arg { >> >> struct set_affinity_pending { >> refcount_t refs; >> + unsigned int stop_pending; >> struct completion done; >> struct cpu_stop_work stop_work; >> struct migration_arg arg; > > For better readability, this should be bool, AFAICT. > It's intentionally declared as an int. sizeof(_Bool) is Implementation Defined, so you can't sanely reason about struct layout. There's been quite a few threads about this already, a quick search on lore gave me: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180411081502.GJ4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/