Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3591509pxv; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymrJpLo/ppo1TnGoIgJaOCf8cuv8/zvlBstgsrDCqIfaYUmZ8X4AxAfSf7XTQnwS5osCzQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:35a8:: with SMTP id v40mr17459219jal.126.1627309657050; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627309657; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L3gch8swyk2NGSy4NkLkhpaBdQ2x0spYfd3lrD1Ty0tzRdqgvnR9TX+DgHEd8VlFxU KmAfe6xpPMXXAIGrm5KQGJ4JMHgIoFxJBsN2Sw+c06l+y40rOSVfF3lVMRDp2fI1JkKW eDWRon5CgHIi1c3frzu6XF2lydc2IZ9BmDTvHVgw8yLmH0WOwTs1Nm7xpZFP/a60SYVr XXfusClDlXx08Q1RiKah2t1MaVjurje9Ax7mw7zK6wxQRihoiE7MIHHC3nTbe3Kq0IU+ CXJPXxlLngyedrLYxmbPRfXEWYcgCbc/pQ39fWav1cI4QXUpjl38RibHiGsS6b/u3A/e 6oMg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=Yp2u7dse23TaTl3rTAEUj8NGH1yeHtwICd/X+MlSFjs=; b=G9Dc+Ugduq9ztXIibiJ9eOanpW6s7RY+8SIfg9ePd3EpU8xqC3wU/nK1O9e5wl0Yab EBoALyB5FDp6gZinMW5gs+6VBRSJ+SNJYpcPV6X/03aBNugQuBaHnsi4sMroMMObhYA/ I/sT3L2u6TihG3Lh4kIijrjwuQuU6Exzoj+XSK/DolH7qa3i4tDwLPx/TH/9zuWf1XoE 30Jk/jRH1oTT1mHkNJ21tjIzZuE4OjnSjMkcNxoal9+FDVGGBQCUFestUd6ffrQ1n/8v euBJoL8hIZFJNMGxgi00L3njIq7CIiVWqvUvjrUBN2XRhFxJRIYE2TS70DMFvDPqqfsY mLgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q21si65581jat.69.2021.07.26.07.27.23; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234006AbhGZNZ1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:25:27 -0400 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:38296 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233713AbhGZNZ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:25:26 -0400 Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 16QE5c7f002154 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:05:38 +0200 Received: from [167.87.33.191] ([167.87.33.191]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16QE5bS8024379; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:05:37 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Fix detection of SMI-off case To: Guenter Roeck , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paolo Bonzini , Christian Storm , =?UTF-8?Q?Mantas_Mikul=c4=97nas?= References: <521d14ad-8952-7ef9-3575-b48cefeb8241@roeck-us.net> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <84665dcf-f036-f059-61a4-cea5087ace2d@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:05:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <521d14ad-8952-7ef9-3575-b48cefeb8241@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26.07.21 15:59, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 7/26/21 6:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:04 PM Jan Kiszka >> wrote: >>> >>> On 26.07.21 14:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:46 PM Jan Kiszka >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From: Jan Kiszka >>>>> >>>>> Obviously, the test needs to run against the register content, not its >>>>> address. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes: cb011044e34c ("watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Account for rebooting on >>>>> second timeout") >>>>> Reported-by: Mantas Mikulėnas >>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>>> >>>> Missed SoB of the submitter (hint: configure your Git to make sure >>>> that submitter and author are the same in terms of name-email). >>> >>> The signed off is there. Not sure what you are referring to. >> >> Nope. It's not. The sign of that is the From: line in the body of the >> email. It happens when the submitter != author. And SoB of the former >> one is absent. But what is strange is that reading them here I haven't >> found the difference. Maybe one is in UTF-8 while the other is not and >> a unicode character degraded to Latin-1 or so? >> > > I have no idea why there is an additional From:, but both From: > tags in the e-mail source are exact matches, and both match the > name and e-mail address in Signed-off-by:. I agree with Jan, > the SoB is there. There is one unknown in this equation, and that is the anti-email system operated by a our IT and some company in Redmond. But I haven't received any complaints that my outgoing emails are negatively affected by it (incoming are, but that's a different story...). If you received something mangled, Andy, please share the source of that email. I'm happy to escalate internally - and externally. For the potential case they were mangled or in case I'm submitting via a real email provider, my scripts always add a "From:" to the body of my patches. Outgoing, that From matched my Signed-off. Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux