Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3721382pxv; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMUXP3c7a63jAcNhhYD0lgK/kQXYgY5VEuykTLcRUFtLe9UitK7S9laaFUdHuZJBrm0nqH X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d998:: with SMTP id u24mr13741221eds.64.1627319618377; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627319618; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mbj79PoCxWEZq0t/9+0ZsjmnneSZ5zNgwxt6GrR7paNo8PxvuXyy/R2akgFgFqV2wR kXSfebvnx/vF2ca/oFI7yuJwBWr4H6aMPfveWyWhJMIBFnV1b2dnd26OsZVBYxLw3enI s482d+UxnehcoUlRjapXjV6SzD0jwUywtqyQt+xPXhRw6A89HpqJY1LdEaQwZSzYieWR ULOolzIlH/V2h0+uo8pOIzIr/ua6zVcsBBqNUz35O3wg/DBE0uI3L0/DBSLrIn26EnNY fRpS6hqz663RpH+KTE7OmAK/Q49Q7Wph2vJ2oKZUWNulLVC99GOr0tDYxauOJeCOpvQo tiKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=TtSP5wwULTXJnBkRiI3hdvC27wg5/iRfN5+c7PEPL6Y=; b=Li0OAgDhAdZ10won2V9OF5QXKaJakga4dH3yh79tkA62Sfba/c/fpgLfmRnTmq/D7u JgsEVQ75JfK7c1rXo+bTMn3i+xFzH3Lia9k7Ix8DMXm3FqQkR+l1oAsSItn0CND1SQce 2lBSGx+qG5ntmI1jSh9ZE28MA8NGmSkV6U7s1NfSWTrtnZ02vB9BwFyrLsyYGx21lyc3 KI1tWuaUXC5/gkyKo/RxkailP1XbnS1NCU7QiIskPrCnW4Pv4LGUufdg2Tc+SIkwmaqs k43sVSCkaHvBeoBYrU6wBo0adnFBjngJhzPPMthkxOA0GgFLhuT2HpSUDq72BnWj93Ei 1O5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ja19si405769ejc.481.2021.07.26.10.13.15; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236870AbhGZQaW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:30:22 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:60810 "EHLO david.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235177AbhGZQaP (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:30:15 -0400 Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 16QHAQW9024999 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:10:26 +0200 Received: from [167.87.33.191] ([167.87.33.191]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16QHAPq7008761; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:10:25 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Fix detection of SMI-off case To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Guenter Roeck , Wim Van Sebroeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paolo Bonzini , Christian Storm , =?UTF-8?Q?Mantas_Mikul=c4=97nas?= References: <521d14ad-8952-7ef9-3575-b48cefeb8241@roeck-us.net> <84665dcf-f036-f059-61a4-cea5087ace2d@siemens.com> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <175ca7d9-254b-ca35-359c-a077b284c9fa@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:10:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26.07.21 16:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 5:05 PM Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> On 26.07.21 15:59, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 7/26/21 6:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:04 PM Jan Kiszka >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 26.07.21 14:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:46 PM Jan Kiszka >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Jan Kiszka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Obviously, the test needs to run against the register content, not its >>>>>>> address. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fixes: cb011044e34c ("watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Account for rebooting on >>>>>>> second timeout") >>>>>>> Reported-by: Mantas Mikulėnas >>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>>>>> >>>>>> Missed SoB of the submitter (hint: configure your Git to make sure >>>>>> that submitter and author are the same in terms of name-email). >>>>> >>>>> The signed off is there. Not sure what you are referring to. >>>> >>>> Nope. It's not. The sign of that is the From: line in the body of the >>>> email. It happens when the submitter != author. And SoB of the former >>>> one is absent. But what is strange is that reading them here I haven't >>>> found the difference. Maybe one is in UTF-8 while the other is not and >>>> a unicode character degraded to Latin-1 or so? >>>> >>> >>> I have no idea why there is an additional From:, but both From: >>> tags in the e-mail source are exact matches, and both match the >>> name and e-mail address in Signed-off-by:. I agree with Jan, >>> the SoB is there. >> >> There is one unknown in this equation, and that is the anti-email system >> operated by a our IT and some company in Redmond. > > Hmm... The From: in the body is the result of the `git format-patch` I believe. > So, two (or more?) possibilities here: > 1) your configuration enforces it to always put From: (something new to me); Yes, it does, as I explained in my other reply. That's a safety net because you never have full control over what some mail servers do to the first From. > 2) the submitter and author are not the same (see also: > https://github.com/git/git/commit/a90804752f6ab2b911882d47fafb6c2b78f447c3); > 3) ...anything else...? > >> But I haven't received >> any complaints that my outgoing emails are negatively affected by it >> (incoming are, but that's a different story...). If you received >> something mangled, Andy, please share the source of that email. I'm >> happy to escalate internally - and externally. > > I believe I see it in the same way as lore, i.e. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/d84f8e06-f646-8b43-d063-fb11f4827044@siemens.com/raw Perfect, then all is fine as it should be (and no time for O365 bashing, today). Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux