Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 05:57:14 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Andreas Rammhold <andreas@rammhold.de>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: trusted: Fix trusted key backends when building as
 module
Message-ID: <20210727025714.3zll7spsmo3opont@kernel.org>
References: <20210716081722.4130161-1-andreas@rammhold.de>
 <0a684d56-66d0-184e-4853-9faafa2d243d@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <0a684d56-66d0-184e-4853-9faafa2d243d@pengutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 09:10:01AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
> 
> On 16.07.21 10:17, Andreas Rammhold wrote:
> > Before this commit the kernel could end up with no trusted key sources
> > even thought both of the currently supported backends (tpm & tee) were
> > compoiled as modules. This manifested in the trusted key type not being
> > registered at all.
> 
> I assume (TPM) trusted key module use worked before the TEE rework? If so,
> 
> an appropriate Fixes: Tag would then be in order.
> 
> > When checking if a CONFIG_… preprocessor variable is defined we only
> > test for the builtin (=y) case and not the module (=m) case. By using
> > the IS_ENABLE(…) macro we to test for both cases.
> 
> It looks to me like you could now provoke a link error if TEE is a module
> and built-in trusted key core tries to link against trusted_key_tee_ops.
> 
> One solution for that IS_REACHABLE(). Another is to address the root cause,
> which is the inflexible trusted keys Kconfig description:
> 
> - Trusted keys despite TEE support can still only be built when TCG_TPM is enabled
> - There is no support to have TEE or TPM enabled without using those for
>   enabled trusted keys as well
> - As you noticed, module build of the backend has issues
> 
> I addressed these three issues in a patch[1], a month ago, but have yet to
> receive feedback.

Which of the patches is the bug fix?

/Jarkko