Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:21:52 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
cc:     linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes
In-Reply-To: <YP2c1xk9LJ0zE3KW@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <5622d120-1b89-6898-d091-8b4ceff6418@linux-m68k.org>
References: <YP2c1xk9LJ0zE3KW@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Al Viro wrote:

> 
> 	The series is on top of 5.14-rc1; it lives in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #untested.m68k
> Individual patches in followups...
> 
> 	_Very_ lightly tested on aranym; no real hardware to test it on.
> Any help with review and testing would be very welcome.
> 

I can test this branch on a Motorola 68040 machine I have here. Can you 
advise how to get decent code coverage? Maybe there's a package out there 
with a signal-heavy test suite? Maybe I need a break point in a signal 
handler? Or perhaps just send ^C to a process running under strace?