Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934476AbWKXImh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:42:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934482AbWKXImh (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:42:37 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:16088 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934476AbWKXImf (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 03:42:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:59:39 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Kay Sievers Cc: Ben Collins , Nicholas Miell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Pushing device/driver binding decisions to userspace Message-ID: <20061124035939.GA27820@kroah.com> References: <1163374762.5178.285.camel@gullible> <1163378981.2801.3.camel@entropy> <1163381067.5178.301.camel@gullible> <1163382425.2801.6.camel@entropy> <1163395364.5178.327.camel@gullible> <20061123102928.GA22118@kroah.com> <3ae72650611230340y750b7996s723a3f5a37a5755@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ae72650611230340y750b7996s723a3f5a37a5755@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2401 Lines: 57 On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 12:40:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On 11/23/06, Greg KH wrote: > >On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:22:44PM -0800, Ben Collins wrote: > >> On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 17:47 -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote: > >> > On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 17:24 -0800, Ben Collins wrote: > >> > > On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 16:49 -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote: > >> > > > On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 15:39 -0800, Ben Collins wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > What's wrong with making udev or whatever unbind driver A and then > >bind > >> > > > driver B if the driver bound by the kernel ends up being the wrong > >> > > > choice? (Besides the inelegance of the kernel choosing one and then > >> > > > userspace immediately choosing the other, of course.) > >> > > > > >> > > > I'd argue that having multiple drivers for the same hardware is a > >bit > >> > > > strange to begin with, but that's another issue entirely. > >> > > > >> > > If two drivers are loaded for the same device, there's no way for > >udev > >> > > to tell the kernel which driver to use for a device, that I know of. > >> > > >> > /sys/bus/*/drivers/*/{bind,unbind} > >> > >> "bind" does not tell the driver core to "bind this device with this > >> driver", it tells it to "bind this driver to whatever devices we match > >> that aren't already bound". > > > >No it does not, it tells the driver core to "bind this device with this > >driver, _if_ the driver will accept it". > > > >> That doesn't solve my use case. > > > >Yes it does: > > echo -n BUS_ID > /sys/bus/foo_bus/drivers/foo_driver/unbind > > echo -n BUS_ID > /sys/bus/foo_bus/drivers/baz_driver/bind > > > >and you are set. That's the way other distros use this functionality :) > > Right, I currently port that part of SUSE's sysconfig's per-device > configuration to udev, and udev-rules will be able to specify what > driver to use for a device, including driver-unbinding/binding. > > Also modprobe will be built into udev to solve the > performance-problems we see with parsing the modprobe-files for every > device with a modalias. Nice, that will make things even faster at boot time. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/