Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.112.34 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.112.34; helo=mail.nvidia.com;
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/11] drivers: Add HTE subsystem
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC:     <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>, <warthog618@gmail.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <robh+dt@kernel.org>
References: <20210625235532.19575-1-dipenp@nvidia.com>
 <20210625235532.19575-3-dipenp@nvidia.com> <YOK1Fq45P/DeqxAA@kroah.com>
From:   Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <60f42b1b-309a-52b2-3090-722a3b7360ac@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:34:17 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YOK1Fq45P/DeqxAA@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2021 00:25:23.3484
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e40ddf2f-c89e-4c25-6afa-08d9515e30a6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.112.34];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT050.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR12MB3547
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Thanks Greg for the review comments. I will address all in next RFC version2.

Best Regards,

Dipen Patel

On 7/5/21 12:30 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 04:55:23PM -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
>> +static void hte_chip_dbgfs_init(struct hte_device *gdev)
>> +{
>> +	const struct hte_chip *chip = gdev->chip;
>> +	const char *name = chip->name ? chip->name : dev_name(chip->dev);
>> +
>> +	gdev->dbg_root = debugfs_create_dir(name, hte_root);
>> +	if (!gdev->dbg_root)
>> +		return;
> No need to check for this, if it fails, your other debugfs calls
> will handle it just fine.
>
>
>> +
>> +	debugfs_create_atomic_t("ts_requested", 0444, gdev->dbg_root,
>> +				&gdev->ts_req);
>> +	debugfs_create_u32("total_ts", 0444, gdev->dbg_root,
>> +			   &gdev->nlines);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hte_ts_dbgfs_init(const char *name, struct hte_ts_info *ei)
>> +{
>> +	if (!ei->gdev->dbg_root || !name)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	ei->ts_dbg_root = debugfs_create_dir(name, ei->gdev->dbg_root);
>> +	if (!ei->ts_dbg_root)
>> +		return;
> Again, no need to check.
>
>> +
>> +	debugfs_create_size_t("ts_buffer_depth", 0444, ei->ts_dbg_root,
>> +			      &ei->buf->datum_len);
>> +	debugfs_create_size_t("ts_buffer_watermark", 0444, ei->ts_dbg_root,
>> +			      &ei->buf->watermark);
>> +	debugfs_create_atomic_t("dropped_timestamps", 0444, ei->ts_dbg_root,
>> +				&ei->dropped_ts);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void hte_dbgfs_deinit(struct dentry *root)
>> +{
>> +	if (!root)
>> +		return;
> No need to check this.
>
>> +
>> +	debugfs_remove_recursive(root);
> Do not wrap a single call with another call :)
>
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h