Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934632AbWKXOzF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:55:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934633AbWKXOzE (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:55:04 -0500 Received: from mpemail.mpe-garching.mpg.de ([130.183.137.110]:29353 "EHLO mpemail.mpe.mpg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934632AbWKXOzA (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:55:00 -0500 From: "Martin A. Fink" Organization: MPE To: Alan Subject: Re: SATA Performance with Intel ICH6 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:54:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200611241407.01210.fink@mpe.mpg.de> <200611241510.11526.fink@mpe.mpg.de> <20061124143040.679016d5@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20061124143040.679016d5@localhost.localdomain> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611241554.58575.fink@mpe.mpg.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2270 Lines: 70 Am Freitag, 24. November 2006 15:30 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:10:11 +0100 > "Martin A. Fink" wrote: > > > Well this seems to be independend from the file system. I tried to write > > directly to the raw device, but nevertheless the cpu time was 20% (sys time). > > sys time is not neccessarily CPU time. > > > This is an interessting point. The specification say that I can handle around > > 120 to 150 MB/s each of the 4 S-ATA ports. With ICH6 the S-ATA ports seem to > > At once ? > > > be directly connected to the Southbridge, and the Southbridge is directly > > connected to Northbridge via PCI Express. So it should be possible to get 150 > > MB/s from north to south and from there in packages of 55 MB/s to the > > disks ?! > > Ask the vendor. > > > <6>scsi1 : ata_piix > > <5> Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD740GD-75FL Rev: 21.0 > > <5> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 > > The PIIX interface needs CPU intervention each command, so in practice > about every 64K or so, and the CPU gets stalled waiting for the disk > during the setup of each I/O. The newer kernels support AHCI which does > not have this overhead, but it is only present on the newest intel > controllers. Can you tell me the name of this controllers? Is it ICH7 or 8 ? What kernel versions? Thank you very much > > > and strace dd... gives among other information > > 6.84s 1004calls syscall: write > > > > So I spend 45s of 52s within the kernel. Why so long? > > Waiting for the disk I would imagine. > > Alan > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Dipl. Physiker Martin Anton Fink Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics Giessenbachstrasse 85741 Garching Germany Tel. +49-(0)89-30000-3645 Fax. +49-(0)89-30000-3569 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/